linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] arm: omap: gpio: define .disable callback for gpio irq chip
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:29:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110105202939.GC8717@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110105192425.GA24729@besouro.research.nokia.com>

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:24:25PM +0200, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > The way this works is that although it isn't disabled at that point,
> > if it never triggers, then everything remains happy.  However, if it
> > does trigger, the genirq code will then mask the interrupt and won't
> > call the handler.
> 
> Right.. I didn't see from this point. I will check how that gets unmasked.
> But even so, if I understood correctly what you described, it would still
> open a time window which the system would see at least 1 interrupt during
> the time it was not suppose to. And that can wakeup a system which  is in
> deep sleep mode, either via dynamic idle or static suspend.
> 
> It is unlikely, I know. But it can still happen. And can be avoided.

Maybe a system going into deep sleep mode should update the masked state
of the interrupts to reflect the lazy-disable state?

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-05 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-05 17:58 [PATCH 1/1] arm: omap: gpio: define .disable callback for gpio irq chip Eduardo Valentin
2011-01-05 18:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-05 19:24   ` Eduardo Valentin
2011-01-05 20:29     ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-01-07  9:00       ` David Brownell
2011-01-05 23:22     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-06  6:24       ` Eduardo Valentin
2011-01-06 17:59         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-07  9:56           ` Eduardo Valentin
2011-01-07 10:11             ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110105202939.GC8717@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).