From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:24:17 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 01/54] ARM: core irq_data conversion.
In-Reply-To: <20101130132532.GB15575@mail.wantstofly.org>
References: <cover.1291118519.git.buytenh@wantstofly.org>
	<20101130132532.GB15575@mail.wantstofly.org>
Message-ID: <20110114162417.GA23154@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 02:25:32PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> @@ -169,10 +169,11 @@ int __init arch_probe_nr_irqs(void)
>  
>  static void route_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> -	pr_debug("IRQ%u: moving from cpu%u to cpu%u\n", irq, desc->node, cpu);
> +	pr_debug("IRQ%u: moving from cpu%u to cpu%u\n", irq, desc->irq_data.node, cpu);
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
> -	desc->chip->set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(cpu));
> +	desc->irq_data.chip->irq_set_affinity(&desc->irq_data,
> +					      cpumask_of(cpu), false);

Shouldn't this be 'true' to force the IRQ to move?  The old CPU is
going down so it's not really optional.