From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:29:10 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] omap4: Fix ULPI PHY init for ES1.0 SDP (Re: 4430SDP
	boot failure)
In-Reply-To: <20110113164957.GA28040@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20110106182023.GV7771@atomide.com>
	<20110106203238.GH1198@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20110106204053.GA7771@atomide.com>
	<20110107161230.GR1198@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20110110185209.GC4957@atomide.com>
	<20110111231611.GX4957@atomide.com>
	<2f1a86cfda277de8d190e5eb9b9ccd77@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110113091546.GA24429@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20110113155152.GG4957@atomide.com>
	<20110113164957.GA28040@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20110114172910.GH4957@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [110113 08:49]:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 07:51:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [110113 01:15]:
> > > Given the very sorry state of OMAP in mainline at present, I'm surprised
> > > that this kind of stuff is still going on...
> > 
> > At least I boot test the patches I send..
> 
> Which is why OMAP3 and OMAP4 can't be built in mainline because they
> spit out lots of compile errors in the OMAP code...  As they won't
> even compile they couldn't have been boot tested.

Huh? I have fixes queued up for the issues that showed up with
merges with various other trees.

I certainly make sure everything I merge is compile and boot
tested. Sure there are still tons of issues still remaining,
but people are working on those. That's why we have the -rc
releases.

Tony