From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=)
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:58:51 +0100
Subject: [RFC+CFT] Use word operations in bitops
In-Reply-To: <20110118154344.GG10997@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20110116121911.GB27542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20110117100857.GS6917@pengutronix.de>
	<20110117104618.GB18626@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20110118153257.GA10686@pengutronix.de>
	<20110118154344.GG10997@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20110118155851.GC10686@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello Russell,

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:43:44PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:32:57PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:46:18AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> I will continue to mail out patches which I want people to test and give
> feedback on, because that is the _only_ way to do it.
Note that I didn't suggest to stop sending out patches and collecting
the acks and tested-bys there.  The automated tests are just a different
test.

And IMHO it's not harder to reply with a git commit-id, but it makes it
more likely that a reply to a wrong mail is detected.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |