[PATCH 7/7] arm: omap2: clksel: fix compile warning

[tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)]

* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [110117 00:18]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 01:37:41PM +0530, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:01, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> > > Fix the following compile warning:
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c: In function '_get_div_and_fieldval':
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c:100:35: warning: 'max_clkr' may be
> > > used uninitialized in this function
> > >
> > > While at that, also add a check to avoid using max_clkr while NULL.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > > ---
> > > ?arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c | ? ?5 ++++-
> > > ?1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c
> > > index a781cd6..baf0b6b 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_clksel.c
> > > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static u8 _get_div_and_fieldval(struct clk *src_clk, struct clk *clk,
> > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?u32 *field_val)
> > > ?{
> > > ? ? ? ?const struct clksel *clks;
> > > - ? ? ? const struct clksel_rate *clkr, *max_clkr;
> > > + ? ? ? const struct clksel_rate *clkr, *max_clkr = NULL;
> > > ? ? ? ?u8 max_div = 0;
> > >
> > > ? ? ? ?clks = _get_clksel_by_parent(clk, src_clk);
> > > @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ static u8 _get_div_and_fieldval(struct clk *src_clk, struct clk *clk,
> > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> > > ? ? ? ?}
> > >
> > > + ? ? ? if (!max_clkr)
> > > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return 0;
> > 
> > Would it be more appropriate to move this check after the "if" check
> > of max_div==0 and it's warning?
> > or add a warning before it returns?
> 
> Maybe this return isn't even necessary. max_clkr will be true if max_div
> is valid, so they cancel each other.
> 
> Tony ?

Looks like the max_div test should catch it to me. Paul?

Tony