From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] dmaengine: imx-sdma: avoid stopping channel in the middle of a BD transfer
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:45:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110121094540.GA9041@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110121155518.GB1897@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:55:19PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:27:01AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 06:43:13PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 05:50:40AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > When STOP register bit gets set, SDMA hardware will immediately stop
> > > > the channel once the current burst other than buffer descriptor
> > > > transfer is done.
> > > >
> > > > * Change sdma_disable_channel() to only set STOP register bit after
> > > > polling the current BD done, so that the current BD transfer
> > > > corruption could be avoided.
> > > >
> > > > * Increment buf_tail in mxc_sdma_handle_channel_normal() as well as
> > > > sdma_handle_channel_loop(), since buf_tail now is used in
> > > > sdma_disable_channel() which could be called in both sg and cyclic
> > > > cases.
>
> As the commit message tells, buf_tail is now handled by non-cyclic too.
>
> > > >
> > > > * Return DMA_SUCCESS other than DMA_ERROR in sdma_disable_channel().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > > > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > > > index fa63ace..ae87287 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > > > @@ -481,6 +481,8 @@ static void mxc_sdma_handle_channel_normal(struct sdma_channel *sdmac)
> > > > else
> > > > sdmac->status = DMA_SUCCESS;
> > > >
> > > > + sdmac->buf_tail++;
> > > > +
>
> ditto
>
> > > > if (sdmac->desc.callback)
> > > > sdmac->desc.callback(sdmac->desc.callback_param);
> > > > sdmac->last_completed = sdmac->desc.cookie;
> > > > @@ -655,9 +657,14 @@ static void sdma_disable_channel(struct sdma_channel *sdmac)
> > > > {
> > > > struct sdma_engine *sdma = sdmac->sdma;
> > > > int channel = sdmac->channel;
> > > > + struct sdma_buffer_descriptor *bd = &sdmac->bd[sdmac->buf_tail];
> > > > +
> > > > + while (bd->mode.status & BD_DONE)
> > > > + cpu_relax();
> > > >
> > > > __raw_writel(1 << channel, sdma->regs + SDMA_H_STATSTOP);
> > > > - sdmac->status = DMA_ERROR;
> > > > +
> > > > + sdmac->status = DMA_SUCCESS;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > Sorry. The patch lost the change as below. Will pick it up in v2.
> > >
> > > @@ -658,11 +658,15 @@ static void sdma_disable_channel(struct sdma_channel *sdmac)
> > > struct sdma_engine *sdma = sdmac->sdma;
> > > int channel = sdmac->channel;
> > > struct sdma_buffer_descriptor *bd = &sdmac->bd[sdmac->buf_tail];
> > > + u32 stat = __raw_readl(sdma->regs + SDMA_H_STATSTOP);
> > >
> > > - while (bd->mode.status & BD_DONE)
> > > - cpu_relax();
> > > + /* stop the channel if it's running */
> > > + if (stat & (1 << channel)) {
> > > + while (bd->mode.status & BD_DONE)
> > > + cpu_relax();
> > >
> > > - __raw_writel(1 << channel, sdma->regs + SDMA_H_STATSTOP);
> > > + __raw_writel(1 << channel, sdma->regs + SDMA_H_STATSTOP);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > sdmac->status = DMA_SUCCESS;
> >
> > NAK.
> >
> > The patches has several problems.
> >
> > - buf_tail is only used for cyclic transfers, so in case of non cyclic
> > transfers you poll for an arbitrary descriptor being ready.
> >
> See above.
>
> > - Even in cyclic transfers when buf_tail points to the correct
> > descriptor the hardware will immediatly start the next descriptor
> > before you have a chance to set the STATSTOP bit. So you probably
> > will corrupt the next descriptor instead of the current one
> > which makes this patch useless.
> >
> You are right that the buf_tail will not stop immediately until next
> time it gets looped on. But in any case, polling BD_DONE will not
> corrupt any descriptor.
>
> > - buf_tail is increased in the interrupt handler, so if you
> > happen to disable the channel after the bd is done but before
> > the interrupt handler has increased buf_tail you poll for the
> > wrong bd being ready which again makes this patch useless.
> >
> > If in non cyclic transfers we want to disable a channel we have our
> > reasons (device error or timeout) and then the data is corrupted anyway,
> > so no reason to poll for a descriptor getting done. Even worse, in case
> > of an device error the descriptor might not get ready at all and
> Hmm, we should polling (BD_DONE | BD_ERROR).
>
> > we will poll for ever in the loop above.
> > Cyclic transfers are designed for audio and disabling a channel
> > basically means pausing the stream. When the SDMA engine does not
> I thought pausing channel is different from disabling channel, or we
> do not need DMA_PAUSE and DMA_TERMINATE_ALL for dma_ctrl_cmd.
We currently do not handle DMA_PAUSE and in case of DMA_TERMINATE_ALL we
do not care about the data anyway. So just disabling the channel is the
best we can do.
>
> > support pausing the stream in hardware, we have to live with the
> What about on the fly setting bit "L" of the next descriptor that's
> not been running? So that SDMA can stop the channel when it gets
> this descriptor done.
I think that would be possible, but this should be implemented as DMA_PAUSE
and not as DMA_TERMINATE_ALL.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-19 21:50 [PATCH 0/6] A few fixes on imx-sdma Shawn Guo
2011-01-19 21:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] dmaengine: imx-sdma: remove IMX_DMA_SG_LOOP handling in sdma_prep_slave_sg() Shawn Guo
2011-01-19 21:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] dmaengine: imx-sdma: set sdmac->status to DMA_ERROR in err_out of sdma_prep_slave_sg() Shawn Guo
2011-01-19 21:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] dmaengine: imx-sdma: return sdmac->status in sdma_tx_status() Shawn Guo
2011-01-19 21:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] dmaengine: imxs-sdma: correct sdmac->status in sdma_handle_channel_loop() Shawn Guo
2011-01-19 21:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix up param for the last BD in sdma_prep_slave_sg() Shawn Guo
2011-01-20 10:28 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-01-21 15:15 ` Shawn Guo
2011-01-21 10:24 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-01-21 14:45 ` Shawn Guo
2011-01-19 21:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] dmaengine: imx-sdma: avoid stopping channel in the middle of a BD transfer Shawn Guo
2011-01-20 10:43 ` Shawn Guo
2011-01-20 10:27 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-01-21 15:55 ` Shawn Guo
2011-01-21 9:45 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2011-01-21 14:53 ` Shawn Guo
2011-01-20 8:56 ` [PATCH 0/6] A few fixes on imx-sdma Shawn Guo
2011-01-31 12:03 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-02-14 10:26 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110121094540.GA9041@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).