From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] video: pxa168fb: remove a redundant pxa168fb_check_var call
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:07:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201101211907.07386.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295608686.3976.9.camel@phoenix>
On Friday 21 January 2011 12:18:06 Axel Lin wrote:
> Current implementation calls pxa168fb_check_var twice in pxa168fb_probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/pxa168fb.c | 6 +-----
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/pxa168fb.c b/drivers/video/pxa168fb.c
> index cea6403..35f61dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/pxa168fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/pxa168fb.c
> @@ -701,16 +701,12 @@ static int __devinit pxa168fb_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) */
> pxa168fb_init_mode(info, mi);
>
> - ret = pxa168fb_check_var(&info->var, info);
> - if (ret)
> - goto failed_free_fbmem;
> -
> /*
> * Fill in sane defaults.
> */
> ret = pxa168fb_check_var(&info->var, info);
> if (ret)
> - goto failed;
> + goto failed_free_fbmem;
>
> /*
> * enable controller clock
Please, don't use the get_maintainers script. This CCs too many people, really.
As for pxa168, only CC linux-arm-kernel, Eric, Haojian and that's about it
(fixed). Thanks
I can't comment on the code, though Haojian, is there any particular reason why
the call's twice in there? Maybe some HW quirk or something?
Cheers
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1295608686.3976.9.camel@phoenix>
2011-01-21 18:07 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2011-01-21 18:33 ` [PATCH] video: pxa168fb: remove a redundant pxa168fb_check_var call Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201101211907.07386.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox