From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:50:45 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support In-Reply-To: <20110122184909.GB11960@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop> <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster> <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster> <1295643762.25868.31.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster> <20110122122018.GC5194@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110122184909.GB11960@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110122205045.GB8666@infradead.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 06:49:09PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/msm.git;a=commit;h=37431502c4 > Maybe you could illustrate how to take that particular commit, which > Daniel apparantly based his 3/7 patch on, and identify who Daniel should > and should not give credit to using *just* the text in that commit and > no other information. I'd add a: "Based a on shitty codedump from a secrit Google repository, credited to Dima Zavin ." at the end of the commit line and Cc Dima to see if there's any interested from his side to sort this out. But maybe that's just my attitude, and a less colourful language would also do it.