From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:55:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support
In-Reply-To: <1295684398.19231.47.camel@jaguar>
References: <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop>
	<20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop>
	<1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster>
	<20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop>
	<1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster>
	<AANLkTi=L+MW5-KLP_TKSxhstD8JEtBW=RKci5wSbZsd6@mail.gmail.com>
	<1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster>
	<AANLkTikVDn+W8t7KSym5tCGZowyYvoLFrk8d0mumiRF-@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110121234930.GK3043@thunk.org>
	<1295684398.19231.47.camel@jaguar>
Message-ID: <20110122205535.GD8666@infradead.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:19:58AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Sure, it would have been nicer for everyone involved if Daniel would
> have kept the original patches and added new patches to clean it up on
> top of that to preserve the history.

No, it would be a complete fucking mess that way.  We tell people to
submit standalone and well formed patches all the time.  Why would it
make any difference just because they were also commited to a shitty git
tree somewhere else?