From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:04:05 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=47z21zExtfHq2WYdUdXeC1rNhe7vQsqPkFsMi@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster>
	<20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop>
	<1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster>
	<AANLkTi=L+MW5-KLP_TKSxhstD8JEtBW=RKci5wSbZsd6@mail.gmail.com>
	<1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster>
	<1295643762.25868.31.camel@Joe-Laptop>
	<1295645098.22882.1.camel@m0nster>
	<AANLkTi=mvdfpCPefGeDr+eGxpSUr3is5jgugHtgB-m1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110122122018.GC5194@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<AANLkTi=47z21zExtfHq2WYdUdXeC1rNhe7vQsqPkFsMi@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110122210405.GC11960@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:22:57AM -0800, Brian Swetland wrote:
> What would be useful would be a reasonable convention for
> acknowledging multiple authors, perhaps something along the lines of:

I asked for the answer to a _specific_ example.  If you can't answer
that example, then you *can't* expect Daniel to either, and it is
utterly unreasonable to demand it of him.