From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:01:10 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] mmci: fixup broken_blockend variant patch v2
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim4i8BibVFmn2C4ixRoMrX5mNU9HZjW2KGMXsYZ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1295275071-13146-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
	<AANLkTin67iTj34QBv3T-9+oMdo6q=EsYKf=5ca=6B69s@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D346800.3070603@stericsson.com>
	<20110118121455.GB9719@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<AANLkTineFJhqMcJbg1YQbPymT537Ef=jVgXLC5uw7DOt@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110119205158.GC6335@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<AANLkTimGmGStr8wHbJhkOsPcrWQmLFFQQCpgizE8+joj@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim4i8BibVFmn2C4ixRoMrX5mNU9HZjW2KGMXsYZ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110123180110.GJ30094@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 01:53:06PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This means that I think the patch I've sent should be the way
> forward.

Which particular patch - there seems to be soo many fiddling with
the various broken flags and so forth.

If we're going to move away from the blockend IRQs to using the data
counter, can we have a patch which switches the driver to use the data
counter and then a followup patch which removes the broken blockend
stuff, rather than somethign that changes the broken blockend stuff
and then removes it?