From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:28:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex In-Reply-To: References: <20110117192050.GE23331@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123001636.GA20841@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123093526.GA26120@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110124102849.GA18459@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:27:24PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Poddar, Sourav wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > > wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:44:59PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >>> At least another person did post results: > >>> > >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117094602.GA2622 at pulham.picochip.com > >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117110308.GC2622 at pulham.picochip.com > >> > >> Slightly different patch - there were three revisions. ?I can't attach > >> a tested-by given to a different patch to this one. > >> > >>> > That means omap2plus_defconfig .38 mainline kernels > >>> > (including -stable) will remain potentially dangerous when run on > >>> > SMP capable hardware. > >>> > >>> I must admit that this series looks a bit large for stable IMHO. ?I > >>> think that the fix for stable should limit itself only to prevent SMP > >>> from being selected if anything else than CPU_32v6K is selected. > >> > >> The first three are the bare minimum required for -stable. > >> > > > > Boot tested the 14 patch series ?with CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE enabled, on > the following boards : > > > 1. Omap2420 SDP > > 2. Omap2430 SDP > > 3. Omap3430 SDP > > 4. Omap4 Blaze > > Tested-by: Sourav Poddar Thanks. It's also important to ascertain which filesystems were tested - could you let me know please?