linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:52:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110126155203.GA10141@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101261023470.8580@xanadu.home>

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:42:41AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Alternatively, I wonder .alt.smp.init could make weak references
> > instead of normal references: then if the referenced section is
> > discarded, the reference will revert to 0 and the fixup code can
> > ignore it (at the expense of wasting a bit of space in the fixup table
> > ... but it's no worse than the current situation).  From
> > experimentation, it seems this doesn't work if the referenced symbol
> > is defined in the same file, since the linker resolves the reference
> > before discarding sections, but maybe there's a way around it...
> 
> That's strange.  How can the linker resolve the reference if the 
> referenced symbol is not in the same section as the reference source?  
> What happens when the final link completes?

$ cat t.s
	.section ".exit.text", "ax", %progbits
	mov	r0, r0
a:	mov	r0, r0

	.pushsection ".alt.smp.fixup", "a"
	.weak	a
	.long	a
	mov	r0, r1
	.popsection
$ arm-linux-as -o t.o t.s
$ arm-linux-nm t.o
00000004 W a
$ arm-linux-objdump -Dr t.o

Disassembly of section .exit.text:

00000000 <a-0x4>:
   0:	e1a00000 	nop			(mov r0,r0)

00000004 <a>:
   4:	e1a00000 	.word	0xe1a00000

Disassembly of section .alt.smp.fixup:

00000000 <.alt.smp.fixup>:
   0:	00000000 	.word	0x00000000
			0: R_ARM_ABS32	a
   4:	e1a00001 	mov	r0, r1

which when linked with:

SECTIONS
{
        .alt.smp.init : { *(.alt.smp.init) }

        /DISCARD/ : { *(.exit.text) }
}

$ arm-linux-ld -T t.lds -r -o t.oo t.o
`a' referenced in section `.alt.smp.fixup' of t.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of t.o

So I don't think weak symbols work like we want them to.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-26 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-17 19:20 [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 01/14] ARM: bitops: ensure set/clear/change bitops take a word-aligned pointer Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  6:00   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 14:30     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 18:20       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 15:11     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-25 19:50   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  5:42   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23  0:16   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-23  4:44     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23  9:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24  8:38         ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24  8:57           ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 10:28             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 13:47               ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 14:11                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 14:54                   ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 15:00                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 13:57     ` Will Deacon
2011-01-25 14:11       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 14:19         ` Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <000601cbbc97$cc6955d0$653c0170$%deacon@arm.com>
2011-01-25 21:38       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-25 19:51   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:13   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-25 16:43   ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 16:59     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 17:33       ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 17:46         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 21:21           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 11:11             ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 12:44               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 17:25                 ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups Dave P. Martin
2011-01-26 21:31                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-27 14:37                     ` [PATCH v2] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups " Dave Martin
2011-01-27 16:46                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 14:22                   ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 12:56                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 14:11                       ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:13                         ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:46                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 18:29                             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 19:11                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11  9:33                                 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 10:13                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 10:52                                     ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:05                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 16:17                                         ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:32                                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-16 16:35                                             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-18 17:52                                               ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 15:42               ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 15:52                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-01-26 16:59                   ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 21:06                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-27 11:44                       ` Dave P. Martin
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: v6k: introduce CPU_V6K option Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:14   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 10:36   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 11:09     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 13:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 15:22         ` Will Deacon
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: v6k: Realview EB 11MPCore and PB11MPCore use V6K architecture CPUs Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: v6k: Dove platforms " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:39   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: v6k: select clear exclusive code seqences according to V6 variants Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:15   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: v6k: select cmpxchg code sequences " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:18   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: v6k: select generic atomic64 code " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:21   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 10:24   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: v6k: select TLS register " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:23   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 22:36     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:52       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  4:27         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  4:25       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:21     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: v6k: use CPU domain feature if we include support for arch < ARMv6K Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:03   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:23     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-27 18:14   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-27 18:59     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28  9:46       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28  9:59         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 10:46           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 11:06             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 12:25               ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:05                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:10                   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:22                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:21                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 15:11                   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 16:49                     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: v6k: do not disable CPU_32v6K based on platform selection Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:24   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: v6k: allow swp emulation again when ARMv7 is enabled Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:24   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: v6k: only allow SMP if we have v6k or v7 CPU Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:25   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 22:21 ` [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 14:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 14:40   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 14:44     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 15:01       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 16:47   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:58     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 20:43       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09  0:35         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09  6:04           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09  9:48             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-09 10:00               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:24                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 16:27                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:32                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:44                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:45                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09 17:48                       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 10:01     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:04       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 13:12         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:16           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 20:45           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-11 21:07             ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110126155203.GA10141@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).