From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: anarsoul@gmail.com (Vasily Khoruzhick) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:48:51 +0200 Subject: PXA270 overlay problem In-Reply-To: <201101312035.05681.anarsoul@gmail.com> References: <201101262246.01164.anarsoul@gmail.com> <20110131173929.GC32737@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201101312035.05681.anarsoul@gmail.com> Message-ID: <201101312248.52079.anarsoul@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 31 January 2011 20:35:05 Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > On Monday 31 January 2011 19:39:29 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 07:08:48PM +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > > On Monday 31 January 2011 15:04:14 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > > > > Hi, I'm experiencing problems with overlay1/overlay2 on PXA270 > > > > > using pxafb driver. Main problem is overlays just don't work for > > > > > some reason, and even more - after enabling any overlay something > > > > > weird happens (LCD blinks for a 0.5 second, and then main plane > > > > > comes back, no overlay plane is visible), I'm getting following > > > > > messages on dmesg: > > > > > > > > > > [ 93.679574] overlay1fb_disable: timeout disabling overlay1 > > > > > [ 95.601537] BUG: Bad page state in process sh pfn:a1b60 > > > > > [ 95.601645] page:c0456c00 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) > > > > > index:0x0 [ 95.601698] page flags: 0x200(arch_1) > > > > > > > > Ouch. PG_arch_1 is our 'dcache clean' bit, which we set to indicate > > > > that the page is clean. This should never be set on a newly > > > > allocated page. > > > > > > > > It's cleared by generic code whenever a page enters the free lists, > > > > so newly allocated pages should never have the bit set. > > > > > > > > What your report means is that someone did DMA cache maintainence > > > > (specifically, unmapping the page), copied the page as a result of > > > > a COW fault, or called flush_dcache_page() on an already free'd page. > > > > > > > > Maybe the pages were mapped into userspace, meanwhile someone free'd > > > > the pages. > > > > > > > > And yes, I can see one way that this could happen: > > > > > > > > - open overlay > > > > - map buffer > > > > - set framebuffer parameters > > > > > > > > (free's mapped buffer, leaving the mapped one in place, creates > > > > new > > > > > > > > buffer) - close overlay > > > > > > But I map framebuffer only after FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO ioctl. > > > > > > > Maybe another way: > > > > > > > > static int overlayfb_release(struct fb_info *info, int user) > > > > { > > > > > > > > struct pxafb_layer *ofb = (struct pxafb_layer*) info; > > > > > > > > atomic_dec(&ofb->usage); > > > > ofb->ops->disable(ofb); > > > > > > > > free_pages_exact(ofb->video_mem, ofb->video_mem_size); > > > > > > > > So if two users open the overlay, both map it, and then one closes, > > > > the memory backing the overlay gets freed - meanwhile the other user > > > > still has it mapped etc. > > > > > > Again, there's only one user - my app. > > > > I didn't look any deeper so I can't say - but it feels very much like > > this kind of thing is responsible for your problem. > > > > Things actually get worse if I look at the driver: > > > > static int overlayfb_open(struct fb_info *info, int user) > > { > > > > /* allow only one user at a time */ > > if (atomic_inc_and_test(&ofb->usage)) > > > > return -EBUSY; > > > > This is rubbish. atomic_inc_and_test(v) does: > > val = *v; > > val += 1; > > *v = val; > > > > return val == 0; > > > > So this doesn't stop multiple opens (and arguably you _can't_ prevent > > multiple opens anyway.) > > > > Anyway, I think it would be worth fixing this, and seeing what the effect > > is. Note that one of the side effects of one of this changes is that you > > only get one attempt at increasing the memory size in > > FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO. Once the buffer has been allocated, we never change > > it - as there is no way of knowing whether it's mapped or not. > > > > The other change is that we properly remove all references to the > > allocated memory when closing the device - which ensures that an open() > > followed by mmap() with no FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO call will always fail. > > > > Lastly, it does allow concurrent opens, but makes sure that we have the > > necessary number of closes before freeing the buffer. > > > > Please give this a try and see whether it makes any difference for you. > > Overlay still does not work, but now it does not crash system. Driver > complains: > > [ 36.062235] overlay1fb_disable: timeout disabling overlay1 > > Regards > Vasily I got it working and now understand why this bug happens. pxafb driver tries to enable overlay (and set its params, allocates memory) in fb_set_par callback, but it will be called only if vscreeninfo is changed. But it disables overlay (and frees memory) on release. I'll will send a patch as soon as I fix it. Regards Vasily