From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:05:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] mmci: restrict DMA usage to large, even multiblock
	transfers
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimN=bxJzGFDc50-ZUMmCtXaGxVUd9-Zg1+QGfNf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1296556873-2730-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
	<20110201105408.GA31216@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<4D47EFB6.5090509@stericsson.com>
	<20110201114522.GD31216@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20110201115832.GF31216@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<AANLkTimN=bxJzGFDc50-ZUMmCtXaGxVUd9-Zg1+QGfNf@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110201150542.GM31216@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:07:12PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/2/1 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>:
> 
> > So... I think this patch will work fine on ST variants, returning the
> > DMA request signals back to their classic meaning. ?That being LSREQ
> > is only activated on the _final_ transfer rather than the last 8
> > transfers, which as Linus describes makes your DMA controller complete
> > on the 8th-to-last transfer.
> 
> I've tested this patch on MMC and SD on U8500 and it works
> fine, so
> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Thanks.  Can I apply that to the DMA patch too (and combine this with the
main MMCI DMA patch) ?