From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:47:39 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add framework In-Reply-To: <20110202121147.GA24993@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1296470024-26854-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1296470024-26854-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20110131153831.dca62146.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110131223859.27169db0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110131234028.8744b5fd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110202121147.GA24993@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110204014738.GP3322@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [110202 04:10]: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:12:38AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >> >> I'll do a quick respin of the patches with that and the > > >> >> hwspinlock_internal.h comment above. > > >> > > > >> > OK.. > > >> > > > >> > The patch series looks OK to me. > > >> > > >> Can I add your Acked-by on the non-omap parts when I respin the series ? > > > > > > spose so. ?I don't normally do acked-by's. ?I think it's my way of > > > avoiding getting blamed when it all blows up. > > > > I don't want to be breaking old habits then :) > > > > >> > Maybe Tony or Russell or Greg can grab them > > >> > if they like the look of it all? > > > > Let's just wait a bit for Tony's or Russell's or Greg's answer. > > As it touches OMAP code, it makes sense to merge it through Tony's tree > as that should reduce the number of possible conflicts. OK I'll take them then. Regards, Tony