linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Locking in the clk API, part 2: clk_prepare/clk_unprepare
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:21:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110204102120.GJ30452@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110204095424.GB2347@richard-laptop>

Hello Richard,

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 05:54:24PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:24:09PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 12:59:11PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > On 02/01/2011 07:24 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > I'd also be tempted at this stage to build-in a no-op dummy clock,
> > > > that being the NULL clk:
> > > >
> > > > int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
> > > > {
> > > > 	int ret = 0;
> > > >
> > > > 	if (clk) {
> > > > 		mutex_lock(&clk->mutex);
> > > > 		if (clk->prepared == 0)
> > > > 			ret = clk->ops->prepare(clk);
> > > > 		if (ret == 0)
> > > > 			clk->prepared++;
> > > > 		mutex_unlock(&clk->mutex);
> > > > 	}
> > > >
> > > > 	return ret;
> > > > }
> > > 
> > > I'm afraid this will hide enable/disable imbalances on some targets and
> > > then expose them on others. Maybe its not a big problem though since
> > > this also elegantly handles the root(s) of the tree.
> > 
> > You can't catch enable/disable imbalances in the prepare code, and you
> > can't really catch them in the unprepare code either.
> > 
> > Consider two drivers sharing the same struct clk.  When the second driver
> > prepares the clock, the enable count could well be non-zero, caused by
> > the first driver.  Ditto for when the second driver is removed, and it
> > calls unprepare - the enable count may well be non-zero.
> > 
> > The only thing you can check is that when the prepare count is zero,
> > the enable count is also zero.  You can also check in clk_enable() and
> > clk_disable() that the prepare count is non-zero.
> but how can we check prepare count without mutex lock? Even if prepare count
> is atomic_t, it can not guarantee the clock is actually prepared or unprepared.
> So it's important for driver writer to maintain the call sequence.
I happily point out that the prepare_count needs to be protected by a
spinlock and you need a flag that signals a prepare or unprepare is
currently running.

SCNR
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-04 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 128+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-01  9:11 Locking in the clk API, part 2: clk_prepare/clk_unprepare Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-01 10:54 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-01 13:05   ` Jassi Brar
2011-02-01 14:00     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-01 15:14       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-01 15:22         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-01 15:28           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-01 20:57             ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-02  2:31             ` Jassi Brar
2011-02-01 13:15   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-01 14:18     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-01 14:39       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-01 15:18         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-01 15:24           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-01 15:53             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-01 17:06               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-01 19:32                 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-01 19:56                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-01 20:21                     ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-01 20:43                       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-04  9:33                         ` Richard Zhao
2011-02-01 20:06                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01 20:33             ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-01 20:36               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-01 20:59             ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-01 21:24               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-04  9:54                 ` Richard Zhao
2011-02-04 10:21                   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-02-04 10:57                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-04 10:48                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-04 11:04                     ` Jassi Brar
2011-02-04 11:18                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-04 11:51                         ` Jassi Brar
2011-02-04 12:05                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-01 14:40       ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-04 12:45 ` Richard Zhao
2011-02-04 13:20   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-07  6:07 ` [RFC, PATCH 3/3] clk: add warnings for incorrect enable/prepare semantics Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-07  6:29   ` Jassi Brar
2011-02-07  7:00     ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-07  8:05   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-07  8:08     ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-07 14:24       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-10  4:26         ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-07  6:07 ` [RFC,PATCH 1/3] Add a common struct clk Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-07  7:05   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-07  8:08   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-07  8:21   ` Dima Zavin
2011-02-07  8:22     ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-07 19:59   ` Colin Cross
2011-02-08  1:40     ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-07 20:20   ` Ryan Mallon
2011-02-08  2:54     ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-08  3:30       ` Ryan Mallon
2011-02-08  7:28         ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-07  6:07 ` [RFC,PATCH 0/3] Common struct clk implementation, v11 Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-07  6:07 ` [RFC,PATCH 2/3] clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-09  6:41 ` [RFC,PATCH 0/3] Common struct clk implementation, v12 Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-09  6:41   ` [RFC, PATCH 3/3] clk: add warnings for incorrect enable/prepare semantics Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-10  9:37     ` Richard Zhao
2011-02-15  2:00       ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-09  6:41   ` [RFC,PATCH 2/3] clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-09  6:58     ` Fabio Giovagnini
2011-02-10 23:23     ` Ryan Mallon
2011-02-15  1:41       ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-15  4:51         ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-15  6:18           ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-15  6:31             ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-09  6:41   ` [RFC,PATCH 1/3] Add a common struct clk Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-09  9:00     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-09 20:21     ` Ryan Mallon
2011-02-09 20:39       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-09 20:42         ` Ryan Mallon
2011-02-10 10:03       ` Richard Zhao
2011-02-10 10:10         ` Ryan Mallon
2011-02-10 12:45           ` Richard Zhao
2011-02-10 10:46         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-10 13:08           ` Richard Zhao
2011-02-10 13:13             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-15  1:36       ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-15  1:43         ` Ryan Mallon
2011-02-10  5:16     ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-15  2:41       ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-15  5:33         ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-15  7:26           ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-15  8:33             ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-15  8:37             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-15  9:33               ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-15 14:13                 ` Richard Zhao
2011-02-20 13:07                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-16  4:53           ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-20 13:13           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-21  2:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v13 Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-21  2:50   ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-21 19:51     ` Ryan Mallon
2011-02-21 23:29       ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-21  2:50   ` [PATCH 1/2] Add a common struct clk Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-22 20:17     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-23  2:49       ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-02-22 23:33   ` [PATCH] wip: convert imx27 to " Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-23  4:17     ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-23  8:15       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-03-03  6:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v14 Jeremy Kerr
2011-03-03  6:40   ` [PATCH 1/2] Add a common struct clk Jeremy Kerr
2011-04-14 12:49     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-03-03  6:40   ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks Jeremy Kerr
2011-03-14 10:16   ` [PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v14 Uwe Kleine-König
2011-03-15  4:31   ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-03-21  2:33     ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-04-14  4:20   ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-04-14 10:00     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 10:23       ` Jeremy Kerr
2011-04-14 10:26         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 10:25       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-04-14 10:32         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 11:59           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-14 12:09             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 13:39               ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-14 14:00                 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-14 15:38                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 16:06                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-14 17:20                   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-18 10:54                   ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-20 14:28                     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20 16:41                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-20 21:30                         ` Paul McKenney
2011-04-14 19:29               ` Saravana Kannan
2011-04-14 16:08           ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110204102120.GJ30452@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).