From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jeremy.kerr@canonical.com (Jeremy Kerr) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:41:00 +0800 Subject: [RFC,PATCH 2/3] clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks In-Reply-To: <4D54738C.80900@bluewatersys.com> References: <1297233693.242725.820672531799.2.gpush@pororo> <4D54738C.80900@bluewatersys.com> Message-ID: <201102150941.00668.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Ryan, > A fixed clock may still have other operations such as enable/disable. Then it's not a fixed clock; I'd prefer this to be a separate type, as it's now hardware dependent. > Maybe do something like this instead: > #define INIT_CLK_FIXED(name, ops, r) { \ > .clk = INIT_CLK(name.clk, ops, rate), \ > .clk.ops.get_rate = clk_fixed_get_rate, \ > .rate = (r), \ > } > > That's untested though. I'm not sure if you can reliably assign > something twice in a struct initialiser? also, clk->ops is a const. Cheers, Jeremy