linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ARM: reenable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
@ 2011-02-16 17:23 Uwe Kleine-König
  2011-02-16 17:29 ` Randy Dunlap
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-02-16 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

For 2.6.38-rc4-git9 only 29 out of 133 defconfigs still produce section
mismatches.  These defconfigs produce 55 mismatches (weighted sum, so
maybe less uniq mismatches).

This is in my opinion enough to start scaring people about the remaining
problems.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 3967c23..1130dd4 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK
 
 config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
 	bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
-	depends on UNDEFINED || (BLACKFIN)
+	depends on ARM || BLACKFIN
 	default y
 	# This option is on purpose disabled for now.
 	# It will be enabled when we are down to a reasonable number
-- 
1.7.2.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] ARM: reenable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
  2011-02-16 17:23 [PATCH] ARM: reenable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2011-02-16 17:29 ` Randy Dunlap
  2011-02-16 19:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  2011-02-16 20:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2011-02-16 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:23:13 +0100 Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:

> For 2.6.38-rc4-git9 only 29 out of 133 defconfigs still produce section
> mismatches.  These defconfigs produce 55 mismatches (weighted sum, so
> maybe less uniq mismatches).
> 
> This is in my opinion enough to start scaring people about the remaining
> problems.

Yes, we have way too many of these and need more eyes on them.


> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.debug |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 3967c23..1130dd4 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK
>  
>  config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
>  	bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> -	depends on UNDEFINED || (BLACKFIN)
> +	depends on ARM || BLACKFIN

I would even like something like this:

	depends on ARM || BLACKFIN || KERNEL_DEVELOPER

or even
	select DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH if KERNEL_DEVELOPER

to make these warnings appear... but even with today's other warnings, lots
of them are ignored.


>  	default y
>  	# This option is on purpose disabled for now.
>  	# It will be enabled when we are down to a reasonable number
> -- 


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] ARM: reenable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
  2011-02-16 17:23 [PATCH] ARM: reenable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH Uwe Kleine-König
  2011-02-16 17:29 ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2011-02-16 19:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  2011-02-16 20:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-02-16 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 06:23:13PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> For 2.6.38-rc4-git9 only 29 out of 133 defconfigs still produce section
> mismatches.  These defconfigs produce 55 mismatches (weighted sum, so
> maybe less uniq mismatches).
> 
> This is in my opinion enough to start scaring people about the remaining
> problems.
@Vincent: Additionally it would be great if kautobuild would recognise
these as warnings.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] ARM: reenable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
  2011-02-16 17:23 [PATCH] ARM: reenable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH Uwe Kleine-König
  2011-02-16 17:29 ` Randy Dunlap
  2011-02-16 19:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2011-02-16 20:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
  2011-02-18 20:47   ` [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis Uwe Kleine-König
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2011-02-16 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 06:23:13PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> For 2.6.38-rc4-git9 only 29 out of 133 defconfigs still produce section
> mismatches.  These defconfigs produce 55 mismatches (weighted sum, so
> maybe less uniq mismatches).
> 
> This is in my opinion enough to start scaring people about the remaining
> problems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.debug |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 3967c23..1130dd4 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK
>  
>  config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
>  	bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> -	depends on UNDEFINED || (BLACKFIN)
> +	depends on ARM || BLACKFIN
>  	default y
>  	# This option is on purpose disabled for now.
>  	# It will be enabled when we are down to a reasonable number

If we are deciding to make this ARCH dependent then a blacklist is
much preferred.

I know that we have warnings lingering in the kernel for a long time.
But throwing these waring in the face of people for each build will
be eoung incentive to get most fixed.

Last I took a deeper look at this I had allyesconfig + allmodconfig
almost warning free on x86. But I recall that especially the HOTPLUG_CPU
stuff was tricky as they misuse the annotation.

We could try to enable it per default - and seem if people scream too much.

	Sam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis
  2011-02-16 20:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
@ 2011-02-18 20:47   ` Uwe Kleine-König
  2011-02-18 20:50     ` Randy Dunlap
                       ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-02-18 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

This was disabled in commit

	e5f95c8 (kbuild: print only total number of section mismatces found)

because there were too many warnings.  Now we're down to a reasonable
number again, so we start scaring people with the details.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug |    4 ----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 2b97418..0f77ed1 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -102,11 +102,7 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK
 
 config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
 	bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
-	depends on UNDEFINED || (BLACKFIN)
 	default y
-	# This option is on purpose disabled for now.
-	# It will be enabled when we are down to a reasonable number
-	# of section mismatch warnings (< 10 for an allyesconfig build)
 	help
 	  The section mismatch analysis checks if there are illegal
 	  references from one section to another section.
-- 
1.7.2.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis
  2011-02-18 20:47   ` [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2011-02-18 20:50     ` Randy Dunlap
  2011-02-18 21:42     ` Mike Frysinger
                       ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2011-02-18 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:47:20 +0100 Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:

> This was disabled in commit
> 
> 	e5f95c8 (kbuild: print only total number of section mismatces found)
> 
> because there were too many warnings.  Now we're down to a reasonable
> number again, so we start scaring people with the details.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>

Thanks.

> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.debug |    4 ----
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 2b97418..0f77ed1 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -102,11 +102,7 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK
>  
>  config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
>  	bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> -	depends on UNDEFINED || (BLACKFIN)
>  	default y
> -	# This option is on purpose disabled for now.
> -	# It will be enabled when we are down to a reasonable number
> -	# of section mismatch warnings (< 10 for an allyesconfig build)
>  	help
>  	  The section mismatch analysis checks if there are illegal
>  	  references from one section to another section.
> -- 


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis
  2011-02-18 20:47   ` [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis Uwe Kleine-König
  2011-02-18 20:50     ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2011-02-18 21:42     ` Mike Frysinger
  2011-02-24 15:26     ` Michal Marek
  2011-03-11  0:41     ` Andrew Morton
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-02-18 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

2011/2/18 Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> This was disabled in commit
>
> ? ? ? ?e5f95c8 (kbuild: print only total number of section mismatces found)
>
> because there were too many warnings. ?Now we're down to a reasonable
> number again, so we start scaring people with the details.

Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
-mike

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis
  2011-02-18 20:47   ` [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis Uwe Kleine-König
  2011-02-18 20:50     ` Randy Dunlap
  2011-02-18 21:42     ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2011-02-24 15:26     ` Michal Marek
  2011-03-11  0:41     ` Andrew Morton
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Michal Marek @ 2011-02-24 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 18.2.2011 21:47, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> This was disabled in commit
> 
> 	e5f95c8 (kbuild: print only total number of section mismatces found)
> 
> because there were too many warnings.  Now we're down to a reasonable
> number again, so we start scaring people with the details.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

OK, applied to kbuild-2.6.git#kbuild.

Thanks,
Michal

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis
  2011-02-18 20:47   ` [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis Uwe Kleine-König
                       ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-02-24 15:26     ` Michal Marek
@ 2011-03-11  0:41     ` Andrew Morton
  2011-03-11  0:44       ` Randy Dunlap
                         ` (2 more replies)
  3 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2011-03-11  0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:47:20 +0100
Uwe Kleine-K__nig  <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> This was disabled in commit
> 
> 	e5f95c8 (kbuild: print only total number of section mismatces found)
> 
> because there were too many warnings.  Now we're down to a reasonable
> number again, so we start scaring people with the details.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K__nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.debug |    4 ----
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 2b97418..0f77ed1 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -102,11 +102,7 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK
>  
>  config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
>  	bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> -	depends on UNDEFINED || (BLACKFIN)
>  	default y
> -	# This option is on purpose disabled for now.
> -	# It will be enabled when we are down to a reasonable number
> -	# of section mismatch warnings (< 10 for an allyesconfig build)
>  	help
>  	  The section mismatch analysis checks if there are illegal
>  	  references from one section to another section.

eaaaargh!  650 lines of crap added to my i386 allmodconfig build output.

I'll be locally opting out of this one, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis
  2011-03-11  0:41     ` Andrew Morton
@ 2011-03-11  0:44       ` Randy Dunlap
  2011-03-11  1:00       ` Mike Frysinger
  2011-03-11  5:47       ` Sam Ravnborg
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2011-03-11  0:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:41:00 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:47:20 +0100
> Uwe Kleine-K__nig  <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > This was disabled in commit
> > 
> > 	e5f95c8 (kbuild: print only total number of section mismatces found)
> > 
> > because there were too many warnings.  Now we're down to a reasonable
> > number again, so we start scaring people with the details.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K__nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  lib/Kconfig.debug |    4 ----
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > index 2b97418..0f77ed1 100644
> > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -102,11 +102,7 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK
> >  
> >  config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
> >  	bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> > -	depends on UNDEFINED || (BLACKFIN)
> >  	default y
> > -	# This option is on purpose disabled for now.
> > -	# It will be enabled when we are down to a reasonable number
> > -	# of section mismatch warnings (< 10 for an allyesconfig build)
> >  	help
> >  	  The section mismatch analysis checks if there are illegal
> >  	  references from one section to another section.
> 
> eaaaargh!  650 lines of crap added to my i386 allmodconfig build output.

Each message is a bit longish, yes.

> I'll be locally opting out of this one, thanks.
> --


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis
  2011-03-11  0:41     ` Andrew Morton
  2011-03-11  0:44       ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2011-03-11  1:00       ` Mike Frysinger
  2011-03-11  1:05         ` Andrew Morton
  2011-03-11  5:47       ` Sam Ravnborg
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-03-11  1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

2011/3/10 Andrew Morton :
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:47:20 +0100 Uwe Kleine-K__nig wrote:
>> This was disabled in commit
>>
>> ? ? ? e5f95c8 (kbuild: print only total number of section mismatces found)
>>
>> because there were too many warnings. ?Now we're down to a reasonable
>> number again, so we start scaring people with the details.
>>
>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -102,11 +102,7 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK
>>
>> ?config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
>> ? ? ? bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
>> - ? ? depends on UNDEFINED || (BLACKFIN)
>> ? ? ? default y
>> - ? ? # This option is on purpose disabled for now.
>> - ? ? # It will be enabled when we are down to a reasonable number
>> - ? ? # of section mismatch warnings (< 10 for an allyesconfig build)
>> ? ? ? help
>> ? ? ? ? The section mismatch analysis checks if there are illegal
>> ? ? ? ? references from one section to another section.
>
> eaaaargh! ?650 lines of crap added to my i386 allmodconfig build output.

and it's going to keep staying all f-ed up until people start seeing
this stuff themselves when they write the bad code
-mike

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis
  2011-03-11  1:00       ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2011-03-11  1:05         ` Andrew Morton
  2011-03-11  1:34           ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2011-03-11  1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:00:54 -0500
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > eaaaargh! __650 lines of crap added to my i386 allmodconfig build output.
> 
> and it's going to keep staying all f-ed up until people start seeing
> this stuff themselves when they write the bad code

That won't work - everyone will either disable the messages or will
train themselves to ignore them.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis
  2011-03-11  1:05         ` Andrew Morton
@ 2011-03-11  1:34           ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-03-11  1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 20:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:00:54 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > eaaaargh! __650 lines of crap added to my i386 allmodconfig build output.
>>
>> and it's going to keep staying all f-ed up until people start seeing
>> this stuff themselves when they write the bad code
>
> That won't work - everyone will either disable the messages or will
> train themselves to ignore them.

the status quo is obviously not working.  i spent quite a bit of time
in the past to get the warnings down to 0 for my builds and all ive
seen since then is the # creep back up.  if people arent being made
aware of the issue, they obviously arent going to do anything about
it.  some people might condition themselves to ignore it, but that
applies to any sort of warning message.
-mike

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis
  2011-03-11  0:41     ` Andrew Morton
  2011-03-11  0:44       ` Randy Dunlap
  2011-03-11  1:00       ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2011-03-11  5:47       ` Sam Ravnborg
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2011-03-11  5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 04:41:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:47:20 +0100
> Uwe Kleine-K__nig  <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > This was disabled in commit
> > 
> > 	e5f95c8 (kbuild: print only total number of section mismatces found)
> > 
> > because there were too many warnings.  Now we're down to a reasonable
> > number again, so we start scaring people with the details.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K__nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  lib/Kconfig.debug |    4 ----
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > index 2b97418..0f77ed1 100644
> > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -102,11 +102,7 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK
> >  
> >  config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
> >  	bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> > -	depends on UNDEFINED || (BLACKFIN)
> >  	default y
> > -	# This option is on purpose disabled for now.
> > -	# It will be enabled when we are down to a reasonable number
> > -	# of section mismatch warnings (< 10 for an allyesconfig build)
> >  	help
> >  	  The section mismatch analysis checks if there are illegal
> >  	  references from one section to another section.
> 
> eaaaargh!  650 lines of crap added to my i386 allmodconfig build output.
> 
> I'll be locally opting out of this one, thanks.

How about that we enable this in the merge window.
And if it continue to be unreasonable then drop it again
around rc5 time?

The likelyhood that warnings are fixed is bigger if people
see them and get annoyed.

	Sam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-11  5:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-16 17:23 [PATCH] ARM: reenable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-16 17:29 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-16 19:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-16 20:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-02-18 20:47   ` [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-18 20:50     ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-18 21:42     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-02-24 15:26     ` Michal Marek
2011-03-11  0:41     ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-11  0:44       ` Randy Dunlap
2011-03-11  1:00       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-11  1:05         ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-11  1:34           ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-11  5:47       ` Sam Ravnborg

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).