[patch-v2.6.39 6/7] OMAP4430: hwmod data: Adding USBOTG

[tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)]

* Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com> [110217 07:52]:
> On 2/17/2011 4:26 PM, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 04:21:47PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> >>On 2/17/2011 4:18 PM, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:15:27PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>>>On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 02:43:21PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> >>>>>Hi Felipe and Hema,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Sorry for this late review, but I have a couple of comments on this one.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Since I was planning to send usb hwmod data file to Tony directly
> >>>>>like I did for the other drivers, I can handle the update myself if
> >>>>>you want.
> >>>>
> >>>>I'll change this particular patch to yours.
> >>>
> >>>doesn't apply:
> >>>
> >>>$ patch -p1<   ~/benoit.diff
> >>>patching file arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
> >>>Hunk #1 succeeded at 55 with fuzz 1 (offset -7 lines).
> >>>patch: **** malformed patch at line 42: omap44xx_l4_cfg__l3_main_2 = {
> >>>
> >>>could you base this off of v2.6.38-rc5 ?
> >>
> >>This is what I was about to say.
> >>You have a dependency with the for_2.6.39/omap4_hwmod_data branch
> >>in git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git.
> >
> >I cannot have such a dependency and if you create that I can't send a
> >pull request to Tony otherwise we will have conflicts later. Either you
> >clear up that dependency or Tony will have to manually apply the patches
> >I have queued. It's only 7 of them anyway, so maybe not a big deal.
> 
> I will try to rebase that one on v2.6.38-rc5 and see if it will
> generate any issue during the merge with the omap4_hwmod_data
> series. Generally issues appears if the data are located at the same
> place in the file. Since the usb is between uart and wd_timer, that
> might work.

Maybe no need to rebase, I'll apply Benoit's series first into
omap-for-linus, then let's applying the other hwmod related patches
should be trivial.

Regards,

Tony