From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:39:09 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] OMAP4: hwmod data: add mailbox data In-Reply-To: References: <1296674843-12718-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1296674843-12718-4-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <4D5943A9.8010205@ti.com> <4D5AF8BA.8080403@ti.com> Message-ID: <20110217233908.GG20795@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Ramirez Luna, Omar [110215 16:11]: > > > If you have to do several platform_get_irq_byname to get this one, I'd > > prefer to get rid of that name for OMAP4. It will make mailbox irq > > consistent with the other hwmods. > > I was thinking to standardize the names to be mbox0..mboxN across all > the platforms, reason being that the mailbox also has capabilities to > be used not only by dsp or iva, by using a polling method. > > So even if the mailbox in OMAP3 is called "dsp", it has 4 more queues > apart from the 2 used for messaging between arm and dsp, that could be > used even if tidspbridge wasn't there. So what's the status of this series? Can the rest of the patches now be applied on top of the current omap-for-linus or do the names still need fixing? Tony