public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ARM: imx/mach-mx25_3ds: Use IMX_GPIO_NR instead of hard-coded values
@ 2011-02-22 23:24 Fabio Estevam
  2011-02-22 23:36 ` Build failure on i.MX25 [Was: [PATCH] ARM: imx/mach-mx25_3ds: Use IMX_GPIO_NR instead of hard-coded values] Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2011-02-22 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx25_3ds.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx25_3ds.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx25_3ds.c
index aafc6f7..66b6cdd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx25_3ds.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx25_3ds.c
@@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ static const struct fec_platform_data mx25_fec_pdata __initconst = {
 	.phy    = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII,
 };
 
-#define FEC_ENABLE_GPIO		35
-#define FEC_RESET_B_GPIO	104
+#define FEC_ENABLE_GPIO		IMX_GPIO_NR(2, 3)
+#define FEC_RESET_B_GPIO	IMX_GPIO_NR(4, 8)
 
 static void __init mx25pdk_fec_reset(void)
 {
-- 
1.6.0.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Build failure on i.MX25 [Was: [PATCH] ARM: imx/mach-mx25_3ds: Use IMX_GPIO_NR instead of hard-coded values]
  2011-02-22 23:24 [PATCH] ARM: imx/mach-mx25_3ds: Use IMX_GPIO_NR instead of hard-coded values Fabio Estevam
@ 2011-02-22 23:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  2011-02-22 23:56   ` Fabio Estevam
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-02-22 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hello Fabio,

as you currently seem to work on i.MX25:  My mx25_defconfig our
autobuilder tests each night currently fails on latest linus/master.
You don't happen to already have looked into that?

(I don't have looked either, just want to prevent duplicated work.)

Best regards
Uwe

 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Build failure on i.MX25 [Was: [PATCH] ARM: imx/mach-mx25_3ds: Use IMX_GPIO_NR instead of hard-coded values]
  2011-02-22 23:36 ` Build failure on i.MX25 [Was: [PATCH] ARM: imx/mach-mx25_3ds: Use IMX_GPIO_NR instead of hard-coded values] Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2011-02-22 23:56   ` Fabio Estevam
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2011-02-22 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi Uwe,

2011/2/22 Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> Hello Fabio,
>
> as you currently seem to work on i.MX25: ?My mx25_defconfig our
> autobuilder tests each night currently fails on latest linus/master.
> You don't happen to already have looked into that?
>
> (I don't have looked either, just want to prevent duplicated work.)

I haven?t looked seen this build isssue yet. Today I built a iMX25
kernel using Sascha?s for-next tree and my own defconfig and this is
probably the reason I haven?t faced this problem.

Thanks,

Fabio Estevam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-22 23:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-22 23:24 [PATCH] ARM: imx/mach-mx25_3ds: Use IMX_GPIO_NR instead of hard-coded values Fabio Estevam
2011-02-22 23:36 ` Build failure on i.MX25 [Was: [PATCH] ARM: imx/mach-mx25_3ds: Use IMX_GPIO_NR instead of hard-coded values] Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-22 23:56   ` Fabio Estevam

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox