From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:03:06 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: Use generic BUG() handler In-Reply-To: <19820.47240.801312.507393@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> References: <1298939263-16421-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <20110301084949.GA16733@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110301085911.GB16733@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <19820.47240.801312.507393@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> Message-ID: <20110301100306.GA18007@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:12:40AM +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Russell King - ARM Linux writes: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 08:49:49AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:27:43PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > + asm volatile("1:\t.word %c3\n" \ > > > > + ".pushsection __bug_table,\"a\"\n" \ > > > > + "2:\t.word 1b, %c0\n" \ > > > > + "\t.hword %c1, 0\n" \ > > > > + "\t.org 2b+%c2\n" \ > > > > > > %c doesn't work on lots of versions of gcc, which is why we can't use > > > the generic bug support. There's no way to reliably generate constants > > > without many compiler versions spitting out a '#' before them. > > > > gcc 4.3.2: > > > > asm(".word %c0" : : "i" (0)); > > > > produces: > > > > .word #0 > > > > which gas chokes on: > > > > /tmp/cc2hGOHd.s:12: Error: bad expression > > /tmp/cc2hGOHd.s:12: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `0' > > > > So what this means is that it's impossible to generate constants in > > assembly with GCC targetting ARM without having them prefixed by '#', > > which in turn makes it impossible to use the generic BUG support. > > > > I reported this bug to gcc folk many years ago. I've no idea which > > version it has been fixed in or if it's even been fixed. > > What's the gcc bugzilla bug number? No idea off hand - I'll have to search for that.