From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:51:36 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mxs/mx28evk: add flexcan devices In-Reply-To: <20110302125525.GD21601@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> References: <1299063284-21795-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@freescale.com> <20110302111148.GV29521@pengutronix.de> <20110302114549.GC21601@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20110302125525.GD21601@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20110302135136.GA29521@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:55:25PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:45:50PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:11:48PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Hi Shawn, > > > > > Hi Sascha, > > > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:54:44PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo > > > > --- > > > > arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig | 1 + > > > > arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig > > > > index 55bf075..9a1f2cb 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig > > > > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ config MACH_MX28EVK > > > > select MXS_HAVE_AMBA_DUART > > > > select MXS_HAVE_PLATFORM_AUART > > > > select MXS_HAVE_PLATFORM_FEC > > > > + select MXS_HAVE_PLATFORM_FLEXCAN > > > > select MXS_OCOTP > > > > default y > > > > help > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c > > > > index 1f0b708..3cefb73 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mx28evk.c > > > > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > > > > #include "devices-mx28.h" > > > > #include "gpio.h" > > > > > > > > +#define MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH MXS_GPIO_NR(2, 13) > > > > #define MX28EVK_FEC_PHY_POWER MXS_GPIO_NR(2, 15) > > > > #define MX28EVK_FEC_PHY_RESET MXS_GPIO_NR(4, 13) > > > > > > > > @@ -95,6 +96,15 @@ static const iomux_cfg_t mx28evk_pads[] __initconst = { > > > > /* phy reset line */ > > > > MX28_PAD_ENET0_RX_CLK__GPIO_4_13 | > > > > (MXS_PAD_4MA | MXS_PAD_3V3 | MXS_PAD_NOPULL), > > > > + > > > > + /* flexcan0 */ > > > > + MX28_PAD_GPMI_RDY2__CAN0_TX, > > > > + MX28_PAD_GPMI_RDY3__CAN0_RX, > > > > + /* flexcan1 */ > > > > + MX28_PAD_GPMI_CE2N__CAN1_TX, > > > > + MX28_PAD_GPMI_CE3N__CAN1_RX, > > > > + /* transceiver power control */ > > > > + MX28_PAD_SSP1_CMD__GPIO_2_13, > > > > }; > > > > > > > > /* fec */ > > > > @@ -178,8 +188,28 @@ error: > > > > return -ETIMEDOUT; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +/* flexcan */ > > > > +static void mx28evk_flexcan_switch(int enable) > > > > +{ > > > > + static int count; > > > > + > > > > + if (enable) { > > > > + if (!count++) > > > > + gpio_set_value(MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH, 1); > > > > + } else { > > > > + if (!--count) > > > > + gpio_set_value(MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH, 0); > > > > + } > > > > +} > > > > > > Why this count variable? It shouldn't hurt to call gpio_set_value > > > multiple times. > > > > Something like this? > > /* > * On mx28evk board, two flexcan transceivers are controlled > * by one power switch gpio. > */ > #define FLEXCAN0_SWITCH_ON (1 << 0) > #define FLEXCAN1_SWITCH_ON (1 << 1) > > static int flexcan_switch_on; > > static void mx28evk_flexcan0_switch(int enable) > { > if (enable) { > flexcan_switch_on |= FLEXCAN0_SWITCH_ON; > gpio_set_value(MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH, 1); > } else { > flexcan_switch_on &= ~FLEXCAN0_SWITCH_ON; > if (!flexcan_switch_on) > gpio_set_value(MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH, 0); > } > } > > static void mx28evk_flexcan1_switch(int enable) > { > if (enable) { > flexcan_switch_on |= FLEXCAN1_SWITCH_ON; > gpio_set_value(MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH, 1); > } else { > flexcan_switch_on &= ~FLEXCAN1_SWITCH_ON; > if (!flexcan_switch_on) > gpio_set_value(MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH, 0); > } > } > > static const struct flexcan_platform_data > mx28evk_flexcan_pdata[] __initconst = { > { > .transceiver_switch = mx28evk_flexcan0_switch, > }, { > .transceiver_switch = mx28evk_flexcan1_switch, > } > }; More like this, which is slightly easier to read, but the effect is the same. static int flexcan0_en, flexcan0_en; /* * MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH is shared between both can controllers */ static void mx28evk_flexcan_switch(void) { if (flexcan0_en || flexcan1_en) gpio_set_value(MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH, 1); else gpio_set_value(MX28EVK_FLEXCAN_SWITCH, 0); } static void mx28evk_flexcan0_switch(int enable) { flexcan0_en = enable; mx28evk_flexcan_switch(); } static void mx28evk_flexcan1_switch(int enable) { flexcan1_en = enable; mx28evk_flexcan_switch(); } static const struct flexcan_platform_data mx28evk_flexcan_pdata[] __initconst = { { .transceiver_switch = mx28evk_flexcan0_switch, }, { .transceiver_switch = mx28evk_flexcan1_switch, } }; -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |