From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shiraz.hashim@st.com (Shiraz Hashim) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:49:09 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/8 resend] dw_dmac: Remove compilation dependency from AVR32 In-Reply-To: <4D6F0E32.6050505@st.com> References: <1299084372.6974.91.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <4D6F0E32.6050505@st.com> Message-ID: <20110303041909.GT244@DLHLAP0379> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:42:42AM +0800, Viresh KUMAR wrote: > On 03/02/2011 10:16 PM, Koul, Vinod wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 16:11 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: [...] > >> drivers/dma/Kconfig | 1 - > >> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > >> index 1c28816..95c7db7 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > >> @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ config INTEL_IOP_ADMA > >> > >> config DW_DMAC > >> tristate "Synopsys DesignWare AHB DMA support" > >> - depends on AVR32 > > Shouldn't you be adding a corresponding depends on new arch? And since > > this supports old arch as well, it should say depends on both... > > Why should this driver be dependent on ARM or AVR32? It can be present > on any other arch too.. So i thought removing this dependency all together > is better. There could be a dependency on HAVE_CLK as it uses clock APIs. -- regards Shiraz