[PATCH] ARM: imx: move selection between i.MX21 and i.MX27 to CPU family choice

[u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)]

Hello Sascha,

On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 01:11:53PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>  config SOC_IMX27
>  	bool
> +	select ARCH_MX2
> +	select MACH_MX27
I'd let MACH_MX27 select ARCH_MX2, but that's just a minor detail.

>  	select CPU_ARM926T
>  	select ARCH_MXC_AUDMUX_V1
>  	select IMX_HAVE_DMA_V1
>  	select IMX_HAVE_IOMUX_V1
>  	select MXC_AVIC
>  
> -if ARCH_MX1
> +config IMX_MULTI_ARCHITECTURE
> +	bool "i.MX multi architecture support"
> +	depends on ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT
> +	depends on AUTO_ZRELADDR
depends on EXPERIMENTAL?

> +
> +if IMX_MULTI_ARCHITECTURE
> +config ARCH_IMX_MULTI_MX1
> +	select SOC_IMX1
> +	bool "i.MX1 support"
> +
> +config ARCH_IMX_MULTI_MX21
> +	select SOC_IMX21
> +	bool "i.MX21 support"
> +
> +config ARCH_IMX_MULTI_MX25
> +	select SOC_IMX25
> +	bool "i.MX25 support"
> +
> +config ARCH_IMX_MULTI_MX27
> +	select SOC_IMX27
> +	bool "i.MX27 support"
I'm not sure it's a good idea to use SOC_IMX21 et al for both, Kconfig
logic to select machines and to signal there are machines selected with
the correspondig soc.

On reason is that selecting ARCH_IMX_MULTI_MX21 and ARCH_IMX_MULTI_MX27
but no i.MX21 based machine currently makes cpu_is_mx27() more (runtime)
complicated than necessary.

Just judging the UI it looks good.  (I.e. I like the explicit "i.MX
multi architecture support" knob.)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |