From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 14:08:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH V6 0/8] SPEAr3xx & SPEAr6xx Fixes In-Reply-To: <20110305140441.GE27468@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110305140243.GD27468@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110305140441.GE27468@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110305140848.GA6846@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 02:04:41PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 02:02:43PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:56:06PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > This patchset contains minor fixes, renames, & reordering of code of #include > > > files. > > > > This set looks absolutely fine. I assume that it should apply on top of > > my 'spear' branch? If so, please submit this series to the patch system, > > thanks. > > BTW, please drop the 'ST ' from the subject lines, I don't think there's > any other SPEAr which it could be confused with. > > For 'ST SPEAr Clock Framework: ...' please use 'SPEAr: Clock Framework: ...' > instead. One last comment on the subject lines - please don't use 'Replacing' etc, but 'Replace' - as the replacement is not an ongoing exercise. Same for other patches which use '-ing' verbs in their subject.