From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:11:16 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 2 00/18] I2C: OMAP: Fixes and removal of cpu_... from
	driver
In-Reply-To: <4D778873.4070308@ti.com>
References: <20110308105934.23531.83540.stgit@otae.warmcat.com>
	<4D76A164.2060801@ti.com> <20110308233820.GJ26463@atomide.com>
	<4D778873.4070308@ti.com>
Message-ID: <20110309191115.GM26463@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com> [110309 06:00]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 3/9/2011 12:38 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@ti.com>  [110308 13:34]:
> >>Hi Andy,
> >>
> >>Thanks for that really fast update. That looks pretty good at first
> >>glance. I still have to review in details.
> >
> >Yes nice job!
> >
> >>And we need to find some volunteers for OMAP1&  2 testing.
> >
> >I gave it a quick try on osk5912, seems to work just fine.
> >Will apply these for testing purposes to linux-omap tree while
> >waiting for the minor fixes.
> >
> >Looks like Benoit should take the arch/arm/*omap*/*hwmod*
> >patches, the rest should go throug Ben. So for all of them:
> 
> Paul and I already acked the hwmod data, but the whole series should
> maybe go through Ben, because the hwmod files will need some defines
> added in the i2c header file. So we cannot separate the hwmod*
> patches from the driver files patches.

Unfortunately the hwmod patches depend on omap-for-linus branch..

Considering this, it's probably best that I queue the whole series
assuming we get acks from Ben for the driver related changes.
 
> I just have one minor comment to keep the OMAP4 data in sync with
> the autogen, but if Andy does not have any important update to do on
> that series, I can potentially fix that later.

OK

Tony