From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (s.hauer at pengutronix.de)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:37:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110310133715.GC29521@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110308124023.5a952d13@archvile>
Hi David,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:40:23PM +0100, David Jander wrote:
>
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:07:00 +0100
> "s.hauer at pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >[...]
> > > The current imx for-next tree is not booting on my Babbage board. Is
> > > it okay for you with your HW. I'll have to debug the booting part
> > > first.
> >
> > Probably because other than kconfig states i.MX51 and i.MX53 cannot be
> > compiled in one kernel. the for-next branch boots fine on my babbage.
>
> Would you mind explaining (or pointing to an explanation) as to why this is
> not supposed to work? Given the high level of compatibility between MX51 and
> MX53, I'd say there must be a very good reason not to enable a single binary
> kernel for both. Or is this just temporary brokenness?
i.MX51 and i.MX53 have different phys_offsets. Look at
arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot:
zreladdr-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX50) := 0x70008000
params_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX50) := 0x70000100
initrd_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX50) := 0x70800000
zreladdr-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51) := 0x90008000
params_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51) := 0x90000100
initrd_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51) := 0x90800000
zreladdr-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX53) := 0x70008000
params_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX53) := 0x70000100
initrd_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX53) := 0x70800000
Compiling a kernel for i.MX50 and i.MX53 will work, but compiling a
kernel for i.MX51 and i.MX53 will and up with a kernel assuming SDRAM
at 0x70000000 which will fail on a i.MX51. We need
phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys runtime patching to get this right. This
will be merged in the next merge window.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-10 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-04 23:29 [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2011-03-04 23:29 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] ARM: mx51: Add support for low power suspend on MX51 Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2011-03-11 9:16 ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-03-04 23:33 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-05 20:46 ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-03-07 15:37 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-07 16:02 ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-03-07 16:35 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-07 18:07 ` s.hauer at pengutronix.de
2011-03-07 20:01 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-08 11:40 ` David Jander
2011-03-10 13:37 ` s.hauer at pengutronix.de [this message]
2011-03-10 16:06 ` David Jander
2011-03-07 20:29 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-10 15:12 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110310133715.GC29521@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).