linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: david.jander@protonic.nl (David Jander)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:06:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110310170627.2d8135a7@archvile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110310133715.GC29521@pengutronix.de>

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:37:15 +0100
"s.hauer at pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> Hi David,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:40:23PM +0100, David Jander wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Sascha,
> > 
> > On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:07:00 +0100
> > "s.hauer at pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > >[...]
> > > > The current imx for-next tree is not booting on my Babbage board. Is
> > > > it okay for you with your HW. I'll have to debug the booting part
> > > > first.
> > > 
> > > Probably because other than kconfig states i.MX51 and i.MX53 cannot be
> > > compiled in one kernel. the for-next branch boots fine on my babbage.
> > 
> > Would you mind explaining (or pointing to an explanation) as to why this is
> > not supposed to work? Given the high level of compatibility between MX51
> > and MX53, I'd say there must be a very good reason not to enable a single
> > binary kernel for both. Or is this just temporary brokenness?
> 
> i.MX51 and i.MX53 have different phys_offsets. Look at
> arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile.boot:
> 
>    zreladdr-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX50) := 0x70008000
> params_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX50) := 0x70000100
> initrd_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX50) := 0x70800000
>    zreladdr-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51) := 0x90008000
> params_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51) := 0x90000100
> initrd_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX51) := 0x90800000
>    zreladdr-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX53) := 0x70008000
> params_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX53) := 0x70000100
> initrd_phys-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MX53) := 0x70800000
> 
> Compiling a kernel for i.MX50 and i.MX53 will work, but compiling a
> kernel for i.MX51 and i.MX53 will and up with a kernel assuming SDRAM
> at 0x70000000 which will fail on a i.MX51. We need
> phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys runtime patching to get this right. This
> will be merged in the next merge window.

Ok, so it classifies as "temporary brokenness" ;-)
Thanks a lot for clarifying.

Best regards,

-- 
David Jander
Protonic Holland.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-10 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-04 23:29 [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2011-03-04 23:29 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] ARM: mx51: Add support for low power suspend on MX51 Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2011-03-11  9:16   ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-03-04 23:33 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: mx51: Implement code to allow mx51 to enter WFI Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-05 20:46   ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-03-07 15:37     ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-07 16:02       ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-03-07 16:35         ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-07 18:07           ` s.hauer at pengutronix.de
2011-03-07 20:01             ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-08 11:40             ` David Jander
2011-03-10 13:37               ` s.hauer at pengutronix.de
2011-03-10 16:06                 ` David Jander [this message]
2011-03-07 20:29         ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2011-03-10 15:12 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110310170627.2d8135a7@archvile \
    --to=david.jander@protonic.nl \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).