From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:52:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/8] macb: unify at91 and avr32 platform data In-Reply-To: <20110311085605.GK6198@pulham.picochip.com> References: <1299751843-9743-1-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com> <1299751843-9743-2-git-send-email-jamie@jamieiles.com> <4D78CCBC.2010807@atmel.com> <20110310131724.GG6198@pulham.picochip.com> <20110311014140.GI9351@game.jcrosoft.org> <20110311085605.GK6198@pulham.picochip.com> Message-ID: <20110311125246.GL9351@game.jcrosoft.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08:56 Fri 11 Mar , Jamie Iles wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:41:40AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 13:17 Thu 10 Mar , Jamie Iles wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:06:04PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > > > On 3/10/2011 11:10 AM, Jamie Iles : > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/macb.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/macb.c > > > > > @@ -18,12 +18,10 @@ > > > > > #include > > > > > #include > > > > > #include > > > > > +#include > > > > > #include > > > > > #include > > > > > > > > > > -#include > > > > > -#include > > > > > > > > I did not bouble check but do we need no more cpu_is_ macros? > > > > > > No, I couldn't see any in there and it builds for all of the AT91 > > > targets and all of the AVR32 ones that I tried. I can't see any macros > > > in there that are likely to use cpu_is_* internally either. > > > > keep as we need to remove the #ifdef AT91 to cpu_is > > > > I've patch for this > > Is this for the user IO register where the value written is conditional > on both RMII/MII and arch type? yes for #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91) macb_writel(bp, USRIO, (MACB_BIT(RMII) | MACB_BIT(CLKEN))); #else macb_writel(bp, USRIO, 0); #endif else #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91) macb_writel(bp, USRIO, MACB_BIT(CLKEN)); #else macb_writel(bp, USRIO, MACB_BIT(MII)); #endif Best Regards, J.