[GIT PULL] u300, ux500 and Nomadik changes for v2.6.39

[linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)]

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 09:48:35PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:18:43PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> > 
> > if your harddrive is feeling better could you please pull:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson.git
> > for-rmk
> > 
> > Based on commit dd9c1549edef02290edced639f67b54a25abbe0e:
> > Linux 2.6.38-rc7 (2011-03-01 13:55:12 -0800)
> > 
> > For this set of patches that in short contain:
> > - Numerous Nomadik GPIO pin updates for advaced stuff like
> >   power management
> > - Platform configuration of MUSB for ux500
> > - Many platform data updates and refactorings, completing
> >   the work to have a single kernel booting across all the
> >   ux500 board variants.
> > 
> > All have been reviewed on the list before.
> > Three of these patches may be duplicates of patches
> 
> I'm not merging trees which duplicate the patches in my tree.
> 
> > already merged in your tree:
> >       ARM: 6644/1: mach-ux500: update the U8500 defconfig
> >       ARM: perf_event: allow platform-specific interrupt handler
> >       mach-ux500: DB8500 PMU support
> 
> This is annoying.  These are spread across three entirely different
> branches:
> "ARM: 6644/1" is part of the defcfg branch.
> "ARM: perf_event" is part of someone elses tree merged into devel-stable.
> "mach-ux500:" is "ARM: 6776/1:" and is part of the ux500 branch.
> 
> I'm intending sending some of these branches as entirely separate pulls
> to Linus - particularly the defconfig and devel-stable branches (so that
> Linus can see what code outside arch/arm is being modified by other
> people and target his complaints about that more appropriately).
> 
> Merging your tree is going to destroy my ability to keep this stuff
> strictly separate.
> 
> I don't mind merging the ux500 branch into devel-stable provided you're
> not going to send any further ux500 patches?

Linus,

You may want to respond to this sooner rather than later (like today)
because we're getting really close to the merge window opening.