From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:09:51 +0000
Subject: Why don't we have atomic_set_mask()?
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=V5mHHibKftXZ1A+s6xiuqH5X0pqYPMjZod6EV@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=V5mHHibKftXZ1A+s6xiuqH5X0pqYPMjZod6EV@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110317120950.GI29758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:36:15PM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> arch/arm/asm/atomic.h defines atomic_clear_mask() but its counterpart,
> atomic_set_mask() is not defined.
> 
> Don't we need it?

I can't reply to you:

| A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
| recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
| 
|   pullip.cho at samsung.com
|     SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
|     host mailin.samsung.com [203.254.224.12]: 550 esmtp:
|     protocol deviation

Which basically means that Samsung's MTA is currently broken.