From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wim@iguana.be (Wim Van Sebroeck) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:11:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c: Convert release_resource to release_region/release_mem_region In-Reply-To: References: <1298738079-28893-1-git-send-email-julia@diku.dk> <002e01cbd72f$448ac150$cda043f0$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20110318081140.GS1751@infomag.iguana.be> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Julia, Kukjin Kim, > > Hmm...I think, 'res' is better for platform_get_resource(). > > Do we _really_ need to change the name?... > > wdt_mem is a global variable. Is res a good name for a global variable? > One could say wdt_mem = res, if that seems better. If you look at the code then you have: static struct resource *wdt_mem; static struct resource *wdt_irq; and in the probe function you have: res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); ... wdt_mem = request_mem_region(res->start, size, pdev->name); ... wdt_irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0); So doing Julia's: wdt_mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); ... if (!request_mem_region(wdt_mem->start, size, pdev->name)) { ... wdt_irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0) seems the best solution to me (since you then have both resources being polulated via platform_get_resource(pdev,... ). Kind regards, Wim.