linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: dma cache coherency issue
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:03:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110321190335.GG4340@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ZdiZATPde6W8bStZCwu05Am6Z216+LxaEzaTj@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:52:19AM +0800, Dongas wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Similar as stated in the following articles,
> http://lwn.net/Articles/2265/
> The issue is that i got a SDIO WiFi dirver which has the folliowing
> structure definitions:
> ??? struct iostruct {
>         ...
> ?       int ifield;
>         char dma_buffer[SMALL_SIZE];
>         ...
> ??? };
> And the ifield may share the same cache line with dma_buffer which is
> used for dma transfer.
> Consider the case that if CPU accesses ifield during the DMA transfer,
> then the CPU cache line may get the stale data from dma buffer.
> After DMA completes, in current kernel code(2.6.38), the dma_unmap_sg
> will finally call v7_dma_unmap_area and v7_dma_inv_range to clean and
> invalidate cache again for DMA_FROM_DEVICE operation.
> However, since the cache line already contains the stale data of dma
> buffer, the clean to write back the cache line to memory may cause
> data corruption.

Correct.

> My question is:
> Is it a bug of current linux kernel or still as above old article
> said, there's no better solutions for it?

It is a bug.

Another solution would be to allocate the dma buffer separately using
kmalloc, and store a pointer to it in the iostruct.  Don't forget to
free it after you've finished with it though.  That probably requires
the smallest overall change.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-21 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-21 18:52 dma cache coherency issue Dongas
2011-03-21 19:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-03-22 16:51   ` Dongas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110321190335.GG4340@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).