From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: Propagate uA_load requirements up supply chain
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:28:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110329082848.GA10447@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110329075310.GA29330@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 08:53:11AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 07:14:15PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > That's not true. Firstly, *all* regulators are not 100% efficient. They
> > lose *power* in the form of heat. So power into the regulator will always
> > be more than power out.
>
> That's pretty much what I said, yes.
No, you said the power will map through but the current will not. I'm
saying that the power will *not* map through either.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-29 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-28 15:34 [PATCH 0/2] regulator: Fix regulator_enable deadlock and add uA_load propagation David Collins
2011-03-28 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Remove possible deadlock from regulator_enable David Collins
2011-03-28 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-28 18:22 ` David Collins
2011-03-28 15:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: Propagate uA_load requirements up supply chain David Collins
2011-03-28 18:02 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-28 18:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-29 7:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-29 8:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-03-29 8:40 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-28 18:18 ` David Collins
2011-03-28 18:33 ` broonie@gmail.com
2011-03-28 23:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] regulator: Fix regulator_enable deadlock and add uA_load propagation David Collins
2011-03-28 23:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Remove possible deadlock from regulator_enable David Collins
2011-03-28 23:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: Propagate uA_load requirements up supply chain David Collins
2011-03-29 8:44 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-29 16:08 ` David Collins
2011-03-29 21:20 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-30 1:00 ` Mark Brown
2011-03-29 22:40 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110329082848.GA10447@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).