From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:25:33 +0100
Subject: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window
In-Reply-To: <20110331104152.GB3723@elte.hu>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103301531420.28032@xanadu.home>
	<AANLkTim6zg-U6HtAQbqnENqoK7x8erXSqOuTFVC0YE5r@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1103301814250.28032@xanadu.home>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1103301728000.15330@asgard.lang.hm>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1103302255280.28032@xanadu.home>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1103302130500.29543@asgard.lang.hm>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1103310145390.28032@xanadu.home>
	<20110331080634.GA18022@elte.hu>
	<20110331083044.GB14323@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20110331104152.GB3723@elte.hu>
Message-ID: <20110331132533.GC17547@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:41:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:06:34AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Having strong, effective platform abstractions inside the kernel really helps 
> > > even if the hardware space itself is inevitably fragmented: both powerpc and 
> > > x86 has shown that. Until you realize and appreciate that you really have not 
> > > understood the problem i think.
> > 
> > No, I think it is the other way around.  Folk like me and Nicolas over the 
> > last ten years have put considerable amounts of effort into trying to keep 
> > the ARM support code as clean and maintainable as possible.
> 
> Absolutely no argument about that, whenever i have read core ARM code it was 
> always a pleasure. You guys are doing a fine job there.

Thanks for your vote of confidence.  It's really appreciated.