From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:24:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARCH arm: adding new board: CDU In-Reply-To: <20110404091635.GA19841@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1300949648-15078-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <1300949648-15078-2-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <4D8B2068.60402@aksignal.cz> <4D8BA47B.8050904@bluewatersys.com> <4D998B12.1040909@aksignal.cz> <20110404091635.GA19841@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110404092434.GB19841@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:16:35AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:10:42AM +0200, Prchal Ji?? wrote: > > Hi, > > this is separated PATCH adding new board CDU. > > What does this have to do with > > "[PATCH 1/2] mmc, ARM: Rename SuperH Mobile ARM zboot helpers" ? > > which is the message which you hit your mailer's "reply" button on? > Please don't pollute email threads. Sorry, it's not as trivial as I thought. For some reason your mailer is introducing additional message IDs in the 'References' header which are causing the message to be incorrectly threaded. Here are the original two messages: From: Simon Horman Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: zboot helpers Message-Id: <1300949648-15078-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> From: Simon Horman Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmc, ARM: Rename SuperH Mobile ARM zboot helpers Message-Id: <1300949648-15078-2-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> And your messages: From: Prchal Ji?? Subject: [PATCH] mmc, AT91: fix init fequency problem References: <1300949648-15078-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <1300949648-15078-2-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: <1300949648-15078-2-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> From: Prchal Ji?? Subject: [PATCH] ARCH arm: adding new board: CDU References: <1300949648-15078-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <1300949648-15078-2-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <4D8B2068.60402@aksignal.cz> <4D8BA47B.8050904@bluewatersys.com> In-Reply-To: <4D8BA47B.8050904@bluewatersys.com> both of which reference Simon's unrelated emails. No idea how you're doing that, but both of your messages seem to be completely unrelated to Simon's two.