From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 20:40:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] video: imx-fb: just depend on IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_IMX_FB In-Reply-To: <20110406163805.GA11820@linux-sh.org> References: <1302100144-17176-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20110406163805.GA11820@linux-sh.org> Message-ID: <20110406184022.GI13963@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 01:38:13AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 04:29:04PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K??nig wrote: > > All machines having a imx-fb device now select IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_IMX_FB, > > so HAVE_FB_IMX can go away and there is no need anymore to explicitly > > depend on ARCH_MX1 or ARCH_MX2. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K??nig > > --- > > Hello, > > > > should this go via Sascha's or Paul's tree? > > > There shouldn't be anything it conflicts with in my tree, so it can go > via either. Most of the imx changes have bypassed the fbdev tree, so I'm > unaware if there are outstanding patches in Sascha's tree at the moment > or not. I can of course take it though. I currently collect imx patches for Sascha because he is busy doing other stuff. Can I have your ack for the patch that Baruch pointed out? Then I'd take it for the imx tree. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |