From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Differentiate SheevaPlugs and DockStars on the basis of the memory size.
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 23:08:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110407220855.GD17049@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9E2D1C.7070102@ahsoftware.de>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:31:08PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 07.04.2011 10:55, schrieb Alexander Clouter:
>> In gmane.linux.kernel Alexander Holler<holler@ahsoftware.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, I don't feel the need to waste my time prodcuing patches to get
>>> them called "abominations". Which means my willingness to post further
>>> patches just got below zero.
>>>
>> In a posting from Nico before you got offended it was explained to you
>> *why* it was a Bad Idea(tm) and that that sort of thing simply does not
>> work. As a game, is it really a situation with *zero* probability of
>> occuring that someone might produce a kirkwood/Sheeva flavoured board
>> with only 128MB RAM?
>>
>> As well as a willingness to 'produce' patches (which to be frank
>> *anyone* can do[1])...the hard part is producing *good* patches. To
>> produce good patches you need to read and understand the wisdom you get
>> back from the mailing lists you post to. If you do not understand the
>> reasoning, ask.
>>
>> This is why you see [PATCHv${BIGNUM}] so often in a number of mailing
>> lists. If you are not willing to accept *everyone*, including yourself,
>> writes crap code...well the value of your patches falls below zero.
>
> Requiring a machine ID and the needed stuff to handle that for a board
> which just is using two GPIOs different than another board is why the
> ARM tree exploded.
You can not be any more wrong than that.
The reason the ARM tree exploded is because of the compartmentalized
sub-community structure, where the vast majority of (eg) OMAP development
is done independently of the (eg) Samsung development.
Consequently, there's no attempt to consolidate code between the SoCs,
even for basic stuff like 32-bit up-counting timers. We've ended up with
_nine_ implementations of clocksources all doing the same thing in that
respect.
That's got precisely zilch to do with machine IDs, and your attempt to
blame the bloat on machine IDs just shows how misinformed you are.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 20:35 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: Unify setup for Marvell SheevaPlugs and Seagate DockStars Alexander Holler
2011-04-06 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Differentiate SheevaPlugs and DockStars on the basis of the memory size Alexander Holler
2011-04-06 21:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-06 22:45 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-06 23:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-06 23:22 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-07 2:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
[not found] ` <toa078-0do.ln1@chipmunk.wormnet.eu>
2011-04-07 21:31 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-07 21:44 ` Alexander Clouter
2011-04-07 21:59 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-07 22:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-04-07 23:04 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-08 7:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-08 8:38 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-09 8:29 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2011-04-10 18:14 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-10 19:29 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-06 23:23 ` Eric Cooper
2011-04-06 20:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Remove machine type dockstar (use sheevaplug instead) Alexander Holler
2011-04-06 21:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-06 21:43 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-06 22:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] ARM: Unify setup for Marvell SheevaPlugs and Seagate DockStars Nico Erfurth
2011-04-07 9:20 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-07 9:37 ` Nico Erfurth
2011-04-07 9:44 ` Alexander Holler
2011-04-07 17:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-08 3:38 ` Alexander Holler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110407220855.GD17049@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).