From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:46:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Kconfig.debug: Remove unused CONFIG_DEBUG_ERRORS
In-Reply-To: <4DA33720.5020206@codeaurora.org>
References: <1302300518-7523-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1104101904000.17706@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
	<4DA33720.5020206@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <20110412214621.GH7806@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15:12AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > But, I see a lot of *_defconfig files in my copy of the tree that 
> > reference the option :
> >
> [snip]
> > shouldn't those lines be removed as well?
> >
> > I can submit a patch, but I thought you'd rather do it yourself..
> >
> 
> I was concerned that it would be more churn in the defconfigs. I can
> make a patch for that too though. Or we could just wait for the
> defconfigs to be regenerated and then the symbols would be dropped?

Two points here:

1. if it removes stuff, that's good.
2. but it has the potential to cause conflicts when other defconfig
   updates happen.

I think (2) outweighs (1), and as it's only one line, I agree with the
idea of just leaving it for when the defconfigs get updated.  We need
more effort spent on consolidating the bigger fish...