From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:56:42 +0100
Subject: Status of arch/arm in linux-next
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=3+yQU_URj0Tao_MP7v=O7cO_ftg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110414094447.GA1611@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20110414110854.GF29938@atomide.com>
	<20110414120209.GG1611@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20110414123126.GA3336@atomide.com>
	<BANLkTi=3+yQU_URj0Tao_MP7v=O7cO_ftg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110415155642.GO1611@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:12:39AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> For example, John Linn
> has posted support for the new Xilinx ARM FPGA platform, has been
> through several rounds of review, but now he fears that it will all be
> rejected and he'll have to start over in 3 months.

Well, what about my fear that we won't be able to get anything more
past Linus if we submit another 60k lines of code during the next
merge window?