From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 0/4] convert stmp into mxs and delete the obsolete platform
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:12:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110418091215.GC31131@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikybn1pwiz-SrgdSwV6aRcKHMAENg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:23:37AM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > I tried a smaller scaled cleanup before, but now that there are talks about ARM
> > consolidation everywhere, I'll be more brave :)
> >
> > What we have here is consolidation of two platforms. The older one, plat-stmp,
> > has never seen much love after the initial commit and has poor design as stated
> > in the patch descriptions. The recently added mach-mxs can be used for a
> > (friendly) takeover. Adding 130 lines there could save 9500+ lines in arch/arm!
>
> may we FIRST see how you are going to fit it into mach-mxc? NAK from
> me before I see that.
I don't understand that nak. mach-mxs doesn't have to do anything with
plat-mxc codewise. (There are some similarities, e.g. both types of
machines are called i.MXYZ (which I consider to have marketing reasons).)
> BTW, I understand that you are taking steps in the right direction but
> having worked with stmp3xxx and multiple i.MXs, I see it as a great
> pity that a low-end but stable and convenient platform has been
> effectively killed by a semiconductor giant to avoid competition with
> unstable and painful to work with lower end i.MXs, and is also being
> killed virtually -- by you guys.
This shouldn't be in the way when doing software consolidation. Note
that the functionality isn't removed, so you should still be able to add
machines based on the original Sigmatel SoCs.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-18 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 2:30 [RFC 0/4] convert stmp into mxs and delete the obsolete platform Wolfram Sang
2011-04-18 2:30 ` [RFC 1/4] arm: mach-mxs: add stmp378x-devb Wolfram Sang
2011-04-18 2:30 ` [RFC 2/4] arm: mach-stmp37xx: remove mach Wolfram Sang
2011-04-18 2:30 ` [RFC 3/4] arm: mach-stmp378x: " Wolfram Sang
2011-04-18 2:30 ` [RFC 4/4] arm: plat-stmp: remove plat Wolfram Sang
2011-04-18 4:18 ` [RFC 0/4] convert stmp into mxs and delete the obsolete platform Shawn Guo
2011-04-18 4:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-04-18 4:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-04-18 5:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-18 5:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-04-18 7:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-18 16:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-04-18 6:23 ` Vitaly Wool
2011-04-18 9:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-04-18 12:58 ` Vitaly Wool
2011-04-26 21:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-04-18 16:25 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-04-19 9:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110418091215.GC31131@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).