From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:05:46 +0100 Subject: Status of arch/arm in linux-next In-Reply-To: <201104191801.19348.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20110414094447.GA1611@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201104191655.13133.arnd@arndb.de> <201104191801.19348.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20110419160545.GJ1765@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 06:01:19PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I think it would be good to have the out of the individual > platforms, in particular in order to get better reviews of > new cpufreq drivers by people that are interested in them. FWIW when I pushed the S3C64x0 cpufreq driver into mainline I posted the driver to the cpufreq list and maintainers but never got any response from them.