[PATCH] at91: switch to CLKDEV_LOOKUP

[u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)]

Hello Jean-Christophe,

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 05:59:29AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>  /*
>   * The five programmable clocks.
>   * You must configure pin multiplexing to bring these signals out.
> @@ -234,6 +265,13 @@ static struct clk pck3 = {
>  	.id		= 3,
>  };
>  
> +static struct clk_lookup program_clocks_lookups[] = {
> +	CLKDEV_CON_ID("pck0", &pck0),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_ID("pck1", &pck1),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_ID("pck2", &pck2),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_ID("pck3", &pck3),
> +};
> +
>  static struct clk mAgicV_mem_clk = {
>  	.name		= "mAgicV_mem_clk",
>  	.pmc_mask	= AT91_PMC_PCK4,
> @@ -241,6 +279,9 @@ static struct clk mAgicV_mem_clk = {
>  	.id		= 4,
>  };
>  
> +static struct clk_lookup mAgicV_mem_clk_lookup =
> +	CLKDEV_CON_ID("mAgicV_mem_clk", &mAgicV_mem_clk);
> +
>  /* HClocks */
>  static struct clk hck0 = {
>  	.name		= "hck0",
> @@ -255,6 +296,11 @@ static struct clk hck1 = {
>  	.id		= 1,
>  };
>  
> +static struct clk_lookup hc_clocks_lookups[] = {
> +	CLKDEV_CON_ID("hck0", &hck0),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_ID("hck1", &hck1),
> +};
> +
>  static void __init at572d940hf_register_clocks(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -262,14 +308,32 @@ static void __init at572d940hf_register_clocks(void)
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(periph_clocks); i++)
>  		clk_register(periph_clocks[i]);
>  
> +	clkdev_add_table(periph_clocks_lookups,
> +			 ARRAY_SIZE(periph_clocks_lookups));
> +
Does it make sense to add a (maybe global) helper function ? la:

	void __init clkdev_register_and_add_table(struct clk_lookup *cl, size_t num)
	{
		while (num--) {
			clk_register(&cl->clk);
			clkdev_add(cl);
			++cl;
		}
	}

? (The locking isn't optimal here, but I think you get the point.)


> +static struct clk_lookup usart_clocks_lookups[] = {
> +	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("usart", "atmel_usart.0", &mck),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("usart", "atmel_usart.1", &usart0_clk),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("usart", "atmel_usart.2", &usart1_clk),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("usart", "atmel_usart.3", &usart2_clk),
> +	CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("usart", "atmel_usart.4", &usart3_clk),
> +};
> [...]
> +struct clk* __init at91sam9rl_get_uart_clock(int id)
> +{
> +	if (id >= ARRAY_SIZE(usart_clocks_lookups))
> +		return NULL;
> +	return usart_clocks_lookups[id].clk;
Who is using this function? If the caller has access to the
atmel_usart.<id> device, just using clk_get looks better.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |