linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Status of arch/arm in linux-next
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:17:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110422071721.GC841@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1104211629300.24613@xanadu.home>

* Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> [110421 13:59]:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 05:05:46PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > This is why I don't believe that moving this code from arch/ to drivers/
> > will change anything.
> 
> That at least would have the property of gathering drivers together 
> according to their _purpose_, irrespective of their implementation 
> details.  That's the case for all the other class of drivers already. 
> Why would cpufreq drivers be different?

And drivers do have well defined standards, so that automatically prevents
people sneaking in spaghetti calls to platform specific code ;)

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-22  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-14  9:44 Status of arch/arm in linux-next Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 11:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-14 12:02   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 12:31     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-14 14:20       ` Mark Brown
2011-04-14 14:26         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-14 14:31         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-14 18:32           ` Mark Brown
2011-04-15 15:12       ` Grant Likely
2011-04-15 15:56         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-15 16:10           ` Grant Likely
2011-04-16  8:28             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-16 16:57               ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18  8:10                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-18 13:57                   ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 14:41                     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-18 15:58                       ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 17:18                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-18 20:23                       ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 21:40                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-18 23:55                           ` Mark Brown
2011-04-14 14:07     ` Mark Brown
2011-04-15  2:59     ` Nico Erfurth
2011-04-15  8:21       ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-04-15 13:13         ` Nico Erfurth
2011-04-15  1:16 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-15  6:26   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-19 14:16     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 14:50       ` Mark Brown
2011-04-19 14:55         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 15:04           ` Mark Brown
2011-04-19 15:14           ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-19 16:01             ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-19 16:05               ` Mark Brown
2011-04-21 20:14                 ` Dave Jones
2011-04-21 21:02                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-22  7:17                     ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-04-26 14:05                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-26 17:04                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-26 18:15                         ` Dave Jones
2011-04-29 20:15                           ` Dave Jones
2011-04-30  0:05                             ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-01 23:02                       ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-19 16:27               ` Dave Jones
2011-04-19 17:12                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-20  6:36                 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-21  7:32             ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-21  8:25               ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-22  7:56                 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-22 11:46                   ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-02 13:49                   ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-05-02 19:21                     ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20  7:33       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-04-20  7:43         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-15 14:30 ` Martin Guy
2011-04-15 15:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-18 15:17 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-04-18 16:23   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-18 21:54     ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-04-19 15:02       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-19 15:20         ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110422071721.GC841@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).