linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kurt.van.dijck@eia.be (Kurt Van Dijck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] What is the preferred way to share ADC unit between hwmon and input(ts) drivers?
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 07:25:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110425052512.GB484@kurt.e-circ.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB4C252.30005@emcraft.com>

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 04:37:38AM +0400, Ilya Yanok wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> we are working with Freescale i.MX25 SoC which has the same register
> space for ADC and touch-screen controller (AFAIK, that's pretty common
> situation).
> So, to add both input and hwmon drivers we need to serialize the
> register accesses.

1 physical device may contain several 'class_device's, even if they're of
different types.  So in a single platform_device probe function, you can do
both 'input_register_device' and 'hwmon_register_device'.
This way of working actually puts 2 drivers in 1 file, and let those
share 1 lock (mutex or so). A peripheral with 2 functions mixed together
should IMHO be addressed this way. Your driver is the coupling
between hardware (mixed functions) and Linux device model (clean seperation).

> I was thinking about adding some middle-layer to
> perform the actual conversion. The question is what is the preferred way
> to add such a middle layer?

IMHO a middle layer for this type of problem is a bit overkill.

> Should we use a multi-function device driver
> for this or just some platform-specific code (as S3C does)? Or maybe
> there is another way?

AFAIK MFD is a solution when multiple devices have sequential register maps.
MFD does no locking.

Just my ideas...
Maybe I don't understand your problem exactly...

Kurt

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-25  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-25  0:37 [RFC] What is the preferred way to share ADC unit between hwmon and input(ts) drivers? Ilya Yanok
2011-04-25  5:25 ` Kurt Van Dijck [this message]
2011-05-05 23:41   ` Ilya Yanok
2011-04-25 11:02 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-05 23:43   ` Ilya Yanok
2011-05-06 13:43   ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-06 14:13     ` Ithamar R. Adema
2011-05-06 14:23       ` Mark Brown
2011-05-06 15:15         ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-06 15:56           ` Mark Brown
2011-05-06 16:29             ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-06 17:20               ` Mark Brown
2011-05-09 13:25                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-09 14:39                   ` Mark Brown
2011-05-09 16:35                     ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-09 19:54                       ` Mark Brown
2011-05-10  9:51                         ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-06 15:21         ` Ithamar R. Adema
2011-05-07 18:11 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110425052512.GB484@kurt.e-circ.dyndns.org \
    --to=kurt.van.dijck@eia.be \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).