From: kurt.van.dijck@eia.be (Kurt Van Dijck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] What is the preferred way to share ADC unit between hwmon and input(ts) drivers?
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 07:25:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110425052512.GB484@kurt.e-circ.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB4C252.30005@emcraft.com>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 04:37:38AM +0400, Ilya Yanok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are working with Freescale i.MX25 SoC which has the same register
> space for ADC and touch-screen controller (AFAIK, that's pretty common
> situation).
> So, to add both input and hwmon drivers we need to serialize the
> register accesses.
1 physical device may contain several 'class_device's, even if they're of
different types. So in a single platform_device probe function, you can do
both 'input_register_device' and 'hwmon_register_device'.
This way of working actually puts 2 drivers in 1 file, and let those
share 1 lock (mutex or so). A peripheral with 2 functions mixed together
should IMHO be addressed this way. Your driver is the coupling
between hardware (mixed functions) and Linux device model (clean seperation).
> I was thinking about adding some middle-layer to
> perform the actual conversion. The question is what is the preferred way
> to add such a middle layer?
IMHO a middle layer for this type of problem is a bit overkill.
> Should we use a multi-function device driver
> for this or just some platform-specific code (as S3C does)? Or maybe
> there is another way?
AFAIK MFD is a solution when multiple devices have sequential register maps.
MFD does no locking.
Just my ideas...
Maybe I don't understand your problem exactly...
Kurt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-25 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-25 0:37 [RFC] What is the preferred way to share ADC unit between hwmon and input(ts) drivers? Ilya Yanok
2011-04-25 5:25 ` Kurt Van Dijck [this message]
2011-05-05 23:41 ` Ilya Yanok
2011-04-25 11:02 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-05 23:43 ` Ilya Yanok
2011-05-06 13:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-06 14:13 ` Ithamar R. Adema
2011-05-06 14:23 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-06 15:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-06 15:56 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-06 16:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-06 17:20 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-09 13:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-09 14:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-09 16:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-09 19:54 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-10 9:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-05-06 15:21 ` Ithamar R. Adema
2011-05-07 18:11 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110425052512.GB484@kurt.e-circ.dyndns.org \
--to=kurt.van.dijck@eia.be \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).