From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:25:12 +0100
Subject: Architecture specific implementations for tickless kernel and
	deferrable timers
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=Y0CdRt1ktCs7NwG4pLqWeZeLQPg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=q8-1ybXNky04A6WA7+VA5ZgOB-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DB0F249.6000307@codeaurora.org>
	<BANLkTinkkMkyy3OnSiOqgUBHiytFPparbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110426203756.GD17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<BANLkTi=Y0CdRt1ktCs7NwG4pLqWeZeLQPg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110427072512.GF17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:00:54AM +0530, Vikram Narayanan wrote:
> My another question is that, where can I find some examples of dynamic
> tick implementation. Are there any documents for implementing the
> functionality?

Dynamic tick was obsoleted by NO_HZ.  The kernel now contains NO_HZ which
relies upon the one-shot clock event mode.