From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: add pin biasing and drive mode to gpiolib
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:58:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110427215846.GF17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110420164315.6cdbcbf0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:43:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Then of course the GPIO driver can in turn call the padmux
> > subsystem to request its pins or fail/bail out if they are taken.
>
> Yes that makes a lot more sense. It preserves the abstraction in the
> simple cases but handles the complex stuff right.
If one GPIO can be routed to multiple pads, it is not possible for
the GPIO driver to request the padmux code to route the GPIO to the
outside world - the GPIO layer doesn't have the information to tell
the padmux code which pad to route the GPIO to.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-27 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-17 21:37 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: add pin biasing and drive mode to gpiolib Linus Walleij
2011-04-17 21:48 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-17 21:58 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-17 22:03 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-18 0:09 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-04-18 7:17 ` Kurt Van Dijck
2011-04-18 8:04 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-18 8:19 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-18 8:50 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-18 11:59 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-18 22:16 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-18 22:31 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-19 4:50 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-20 12:11 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-18 12:26 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-18 22:26 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-19 8:38 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-19 8:51 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-04-20 12:32 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 12:38 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-04-20 14:54 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-20 14:26 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-20 14:40 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-04-20 15:04 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-04-20 15:17 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 15:32 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-20 15:45 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-27 21:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-27 22:16 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-04-20 15:13 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 15:29 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-20 15:39 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 15:43 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-27 21:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-04-20 0:09 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-20 9:45 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-20 12:38 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 14:55 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-20 12:21 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 23:32 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-21 6:48 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-23 8:25 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-21 0:29 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-20 12:19 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 12:22 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-20 12:04 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-20 23:24 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-21 15:39 ` Stijn Devriendt
2011-04-22 11:36 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-22 11:56 ` Alan Cox
2011-04-23 8:35 ` Ben Nizette
2011-04-25 18:52 ` Rohit Vaswani
2011-04-26 7:48 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110427215846.GF17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).