linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] driver core: let dev_set_drvdata return int instead of void as it can fail
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:16:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110429091615.GR31131@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110429081257.GW17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

Hello,

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:12:57AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:44:46AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Before commit
> > 
> > 	b402843 (Driver core: move dev_get/set_drvdata to drivers/base/dd.c)
> > 
> > calling dev_set_drvdata with dev=NULL was an unchecked error. After some
> > discussion about what to return in this case removing the check (and so
> > producing a null pointer exception) seems fine.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/dd.c      |    7 +++----
> >  include/linux/device.h |    2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > index da57ee9..f9d69d7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > @@ -408,17 +408,16 @@ void *dev_get_drvdata(const struct device *dev)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_get_drvdata);
> >  
> > -void dev_set_drvdata(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > +int dev_set_drvdata(struct device *dev, void *data)
> >  {
> >  	int error;
> >  
> > -	if (!dev)
> > -		return;
> >  	if (!dev->p) {
> >  		error = device_private_init(dev);
> >  		if (error)
> > -			return;
> > +			return error;
> >  	}
> >  	dev->p->driver_data = data;
> > +	return 0;
> 
> Who is going to modify all the thousands of drivers we have in the kernel
> tree to check this return value?
> 
> If the answer is no one, its pointless returning an error value in the
> first place (which I think is what the original author already thought
> about.)
In the meantime I learned that dev->p is valid when the device is
registered. As calling dev_set_drvdata on an unregisted device is not
allowed maybe issuing a warning instead would be OK for me, too.

Thoughts?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-29  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-01  4:33 [RFC] device.h: add device_set_platdata routine Viresh Kumar
2011-03-01  7:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-03-01  8:27   ` viresh kumar
2011-03-01  9:05     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-03-01  9:13       ` viresh kumar
2011-03-01 15:34   ` Greg KH
2011-04-06  9:24     ` [PATCH 1/5] driver core/platform_device_add_data: set platform_data to NULL if !data Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-11 18:50       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-11 19:07         ` Greg KH
2011-04-06  9:24     ` [PATCH 2/5] driver core/platform_device_add_data: free platform data before overwriting Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-06  9:24     ` [PATCH 3/5] driver core/platform_device_add_resources: set resource to NULL if !res Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-06  9:24     ` [PATCH 4/5] driver core/platform_device_add_resources: free resource before overwriting Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-06  9:24     ` [PATCH 5/5] driver core: let dev_set_drvdata return int instead of void as it can fail Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-06  9:36       ` Michał Mirosław
2011-04-06 11:06         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-06 11:25           ` Michał Mirosław
2011-04-11 18:42             ` [PATCH v2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-19 23:58               ` Greg KH
2011-04-20  7:42                 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20  7:44                   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] driver core/platform_device_add_data: set platform_data to NULL if !data Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20  7:44                     ` [PATCH v2 2/5] driver core/platform_device_add_data: free platform data before overwriting Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20  7:44                     ` [PATCH v2 3/5] driver core/platform_device_add_resources: set resource to NULL if !res Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20  7:44                     ` [PATCH v2 4/5] driver core/platform_device_add_resources: free resource before overwriting Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20  7:44                     ` [PATCH v2 5/5] driver core: let dev_set_drvdata return int instead of void as it can fail Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-29  8:12                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-29  9:16                         ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-04-20 16:17                   ` [PATCH v2] " Greg KH
2011-04-20  9:09                 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-04-20 16:15                   ` Greg KH
2011-04-20 17:59                     ` Michał Mirosław
2011-04-06 10:10       ` [PATCH 5/5] " viresh kumar
2011-04-06 11:41       ` Michał Mirosław

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110429091615.GR31131@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).