From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] driver core: let dev_set_drvdata return int instead of void as it can fail
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:16:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110429091615.GR31131@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110429081257.GW17290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:12:57AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:44:46AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Before commit
> >
> > b402843 (Driver core: move dev_get/set_drvdata to drivers/base/dd.c)
> >
> > calling dev_set_drvdata with dev=NULL was an unchecked error. After some
> > discussion about what to return in this case removing the check (and so
> > producing a null pointer exception) seems fine.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/dd.c | 7 +++----
> > include/linux/device.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > index da57ee9..f9d69d7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > @@ -408,17 +408,16 @@ void *dev_get_drvdata(const struct device *dev)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_get_drvdata);
> >
> > -void dev_set_drvdata(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > +int dev_set_drvdata(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > {
> > int error;
> >
> > - if (!dev)
> > - return;
> > if (!dev->p) {
> > error = device_private_init(dev);
> > if (error)
> > - return;
> > + return error;
> > }
> > dev->p->driver_data = data;
> > + return 0;
>
> Who is going to modify all the thousands of drivers we have in the kernel
> tree to check this return value?
>
> If the answer is no one, its pointless returning an error value in the
> first place (which I think is what the original author already thought
> about.)
In the meantime I learned that dev->p is valid when the device is
registered. As calling dev_set_drvdata on an unregisted device is not
allowed maybe issuing a warning instead would be OK for me, too.
Thoughts?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-01 4:33 [RFC] device.h: add device_set_platdata routine Viresh Kumar
2011-03-01 7:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-03-01 8:27 ` viresh kumar
2011-03-01 9:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-03-01 9:13 ` viresh kumar
2011-03-01 15:34 ` Greg KH
2011-04-06 9:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] driver core/platform_device_add_data: set platform_data to NULL if !data Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-11 18:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-11 19:07 ` Greg KH
2011-04-06 9:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] driver core/platform_device_add_data: free platform data before overwriting Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-06 9:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] driver core/platform_device_add_resources: set resource to NULL if !res Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-06 9:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] driver core/platform_device_add_resources: free resource before overwriting Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-06 9:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] driver core: let dev_set_drvdata return int instead of void as it can fail Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-06 9:36 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-04-06 11:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-06 11:25 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-04-11 18:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-19 23:58 ` Greg KH
2011-04-20 7:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] driver core/platform_device_add_data: set platform_data to NULL if !data Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] driver core/platform_device_add_data: free platform data before overwriting Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] driver core/platform_device_add_resources: set resource to NULL if !res Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] driver core/platform_device_add_resources: free resource before overwriting Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-20 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] driver core: let dev_set_drvdata return int instead of void as it can fail Uwe Kleine-König
2011-04-29 8:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-04-29 9:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-04-20 16:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Greg KH
2011-04-20 9:09 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-04-20 16:15 ` Greg KH
2011-04-20 17:59 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-04-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] " viresh kumar
2011-04-06 11:41 ` Michał Mirosław
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110429091615.GR31131@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).